← All speakers

Bio, Work & Ideas

Andrew Dai

Conference affiliation: Co-founder and CEO · Elorian · 2026

Andrew Dai spent 12 years as a Research Scientist at Google Brain and DeepMind, working on foundational techniques for modern language models. He authored a 2015 paper that OpenAI later cited as the original recipe for ChatGPT and held core leadership roles on Gemini, GLaM, and PaLM 2. His 2026 AI Engineer World’s Fair biography reported more than 67,000 citations to his published research and identified him as co-founder and CEO of Elorian, a company building AI systems that understand visual information and reason in ways modeled on human thinking. The biography described Elorian’s launch with $55 million at a $300 million valuation, backed by Menlo Ventures, Altimeter, Striker Venture Partners, NVIDIA, and Jeff Dean.

In his conference presentation, Dai examines how pattern recognition can substitute for careful visual reasoning, producing errors in counting, spatial relationships, and tracking actions across video. He presents Elorian’s approach: specialized visual reasoning data, a synthetic data flywheel combining evaluations, agents, supervised fine-tuning, and reinforcement learning, improvements to transformer architectures, and visual chain of thought. One example uses bounding boxes to identify hotels before selecting the red ones. He proposes applications in robotic scene understanding, connecting construction footage to written safety policies, and extracting geometric constraints from designs for programmatic or simulation validation.

1 conference talk

Key ideas

Scroll to read ↓

Andrew Dai traces counting and video-tracking failures to the gap between recognizing a scene and reasoning through its details, then explains Elorian’s approach to visual thinking and its proposed uses in robotics, construction and mechanical design.

  • Recognizing an object can supply the wrong answer when a task requires inspecting its visible parts. The partial chessboard and Catan examples show familiar patterns replacing direct counts.
    1:29 ↗
  • Visual reasoning includes tracking changes over time. A robot video requires retaining earlier actions and noticing later ones, beyond identifying the objects in view.
    3:41 ↗
  • Evaluate whether the image’s detailed relationships are necessary to answer the question. Tiny visual tasks and questions answerable from text or rough recognition do not establish readiness for complex visual work.
    6:19 ↗
  • Visual intermediate steps can keep reasoning attached to the scene: locate hotel candidates with boxes, then narrow the selection to red hotels.
    10:36 ↗
  • The proposed applications connect visual reasoning to an existing checking or action system: robot planners and controllers, written construction policies, or programmatic and simulation validation for mechanical designs.
    13:02 ↗

References