← All AI Engineer talks

AI Engineer World's Fair 2026

How to Generate Mergeable Code with a Context Engine — Peter Werry, Unblocked

Read the talk

Generating Mergeable Code with Organizational Context

Peter Werry explains how Unblocked connects code, past decisions, and engineering expertise to help humans and agents plan changes, review code, and investigate failures.

From a talk by Peter Werry

At a glance

Ideas worth remembering

  • Useful context connects code to intent, conventions, prior decisions, and architecture rationale. Search access alone can leave an agent satisfied with an incomplete answer.

  • Sources serve two purposes: humans can inspect and correct an explanation, and agents can follow references when they need more detail.

  • The planning demo reports under one dollar and about one minute with Unblocked, versus about two minutes and greater cost without it. Werry argues that avoiding downstream loops caused by wrong assumptions matters more than the initial saving.

  • Review history can supply team-specific practices, while expertise signals help prioritize guidance. Mapping review relationships can also reveal areas that lack expert coverage.

The organizational knowledge agents have to rediscover

A context engine delivers organizational context to human workers and agents. Werry starts with the work engineers already did before coding agents: searching across discussions and other data sources, reading the codebase, and assembling enough tribal knowledge to understand a change. Architecture documentation, incidents, and outages all contribute to that knowledge. The resulting understanding accumulates through experience across the organization.

Werry compares an agent starting a task to an expert software engineer joining a company. General engineering ability does not supply knowledge of this particular codebase or its build, test, and deployment practices. In his framing, the agent repeatedly starts over: each task requires another round of discovery. That makes the context engineers once carried in their heads an explicit dependency of agent work.

0:220:25
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

0:12 · section reference included

From autocomplete to autonomous work

Werry places this problem on an AI maturity curve. The progression starts with autocomplete and Copilot, moves through tools such as Cursor, and reaches attempts to organize knowledge in wikis. MCP and skills then give agents ways to navigate those resources and build context. He places most teams around stages four to five of the curve, where they recognize context as a bottleneck and are building solutions for their engineers.

At the far end, stage eight represents software factories. Werry argues that increasing automation makes context delivery more consequential: agents need both the information they know to request and relevant information they do not yet know exists. Giving an agent more responsibility increases the importance of supplying organizational knowledge that can guide its decisions.

2:322:34
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

2:22 · section reference included

Why access and a larger context window are insufficient

Attaching a wiki gives an agent somewhere to search, but it does not tell the agent which information it needs or when its search is complete. Werry borrows the term “satisfaction of search” from radiology: finding one indicator can cause a search to stop before other consequential indicators are found. His analogy describes an agent accepting a plausible result and stopping before it discovers evidence that could change its answer.

Finding individual facts also leaves the work of connecting them. An agent needs to understand how dependencies interact and how architecture and future plans constrain a proposed change. Werry argues that this understanding requires preparatory work: a collection of retrieved documents does not automatically explain how the pieces fit together.

Putting the entire codebase and all architecture documents into the prompt creates a different problem. Werry gives two objections: organizational context can exceed even a million-token window, and irrelevant material can distract the agent from its task. More information therefore has a cost beyond capacity. It can send the agent into unnecessary investigations that consume tokens and time. The desired input is context selected for the task.

His iceberg analogy identifies what this selection must reach. Code is visible and available for the agent to modify; intent, team conventions, past decisions, Slack discussions, and architecture rationale sit beneath that surface. Finding relevant unknowns means uncovering those constraints and explanations before they become mistakes in the implementation.

4:134:16
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

4:11 · section reference included

Explaining architecture and showing the evidence

The first demonstration asks Unblocked about an internal component, the source mark engine. Werry keeps the human use case central: the person merging a pull request remains accountable for understanding its behavior and architecture. He describes an answer that explains the component and generates an architecture diagram from the current code and proposals for future architecture. The diagram is synthesized for the answer rather than retrieved as an existing artifact.

Showing supporting evidence makes that synthesis inspectable. Werry explicitly allows for an answer being partly wrong: a user should be able to follow its sources into the knowledge base and make corrections. The value of provenance is therefore practical as well as trust-building. It provides a route from an explanation back to the material that produced it.

He then moves to Slack, where many team decisions happen. Unblocked can participate when it judges that it can answer a question, or a user can address it directly. This brings access to organizational knowledge into an existing discussion space. The demonstration describes selective participation, but does not specify how the system decides that an answer is strong enough to offer.

7:297:34
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

7:29 · section reference included

The same optimization plan with and without context

The component explanation identifies optimization opportunities, which Werry turns into a planning task in Claude Code. Without Unblocked, Claude searches the code, investigates the algorithm, and produces a plan to optimize the source mark calculator. Werry describes this baseline as doing a reasonably good job. With Unblocked, he says the plan captures additional nuances from pull requests discussing future improvements, Slack conversations, Notion, and architecture documents.

The returned sources also guide further investigation. Claude receives references along with the answer, so it has specific places to inspect when it needs more detail. This makes the context response useful beyond its immediate summary: it gives the coding agent a route to the discussions and documents relevant to the next decision.

For this planning example, Werry reports a cost below one dollar and about one minute with Unblocked, compared with about two minutes and a higher cost without it. He distinguishes the approximately one-minute task time from the displayed wall-clock duration, because the session had been open for about an hour. These are reported results for a planning demonstration; they do not establish a general performance guarantee or show the resulting optimization being implemented and merged.

Werry's larger argument concerns compounding work. Discovery takes time, but discovering the wrong information can also produce a faulty plan or assumption. Later execution then builds on that mistake, forcing the agent to return and repeat earlier work. He argues that the more consequential benefit of a context engine is reducing these repeated loops throughout a task, beyond the initial saving in planning time.

10:0310:09
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

9:55 · section reference included

Learning review practices from the team

The code review agent uses organizational history to derive practices for the codebase. Unblocked examines pull requests and other sources, generates a set of best practices, and makes those practices available during review. This supplies expectations that a team has expressed through previous engineering work.

In the example, a senior engineer named Richie recognizes an automated comment as something he would say. Werry explains that it came from something Richie had previously said. The system uses seniority or expertise as a signal to boost important comments. This is a prioritization mechanism: it gives some historical guidance more influence, although Werry does not specify a scoring formula or describe how conflicting guidance is resolved.

12:4112:47
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

12:32 · section reference included

Connecting a behavioral regression to its history

A second example begins when Richie notices a sharp drop in the number of issues surfaced by the code review agent. He investigates with Unblocked, reaches an approximate diagnosis, and asks it to fix the problem. Werry describes an internal experiment in which Unblocked runs as a cloud agent and generates a pull request with organizational context available during the work.

The generated pull request connects its fix to earlier conversations. Werry describes a change to a Claude model whose different behavior was associated with the drop in reported issues. The agent finds the Slack conversation in which Richie connected those events and brings that history into the pull request. The example demonstrates traceable reasoning about why a change is needed; the exact model version, patch mechanics, and measured recovery are not established.

13:4213:45
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

13:42 · section reference included

Querying pull requests and mapping expertise

Werry closes the technical demonstrations with two open-source projects. The document query engine operates over a GitHub repository and ingests historical pull requests. It samples documents, synthesizes a schema from them, and lets users ask questions through an agent chat. The described sequence turns repository history into material that can be queried for insights, although he does not detail the schema or query execution.

The engineering social graph captures expertise and team relationships through code review activity. People form clusters, and connections indicate who reviews whose code. Those relationships can be clustered to generate team labels or used to examine coverage across the codebase. Werry highlights the ability to identify areas with thin expert coverage and says this information is also used within the context engine. Review relationships thus serve both as evidence about expertise and as a way to expose gaps in its distribution.

15:1215:14
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

15:08 · section reference included

A task-level comparison and the closing claim

For people who want to explore the approach before signing up for Unblocked, Werry introduces a context engine simulator. It builds context behind the scenes for an individual task, then runs the task with and without that context so users can compare the differences. Its stated purpose is to make the effect of context visible on a task, rather than ask users to infer that effect from a general description.

Werry ends with a customer report of 50% fewer tokens, faster triage, and better answers. The report supplies no workload or evaluation method, so the percentage remains a customer-specific claim. He then points attendees to his colleague Brandon's follow-up talk for more detail on what context engines can do and closes the presentation.

17:0017:03
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

17:00 · section reference included

Read the complete timestamped transcript
  1. 0:12

    What we do at Unblocks is we build a

  2. 0:13

    context engine. I just want to do a

  3. 0:15

    quick sound check at the back to make

  4. 0:17

    sure everyone can hear me fine. Can you

  5. 0:18

    guys Yeah, we're good. Awesome. So at a

  6. 0:22

    high level, a context engine delivers

  7. 0:25

    organizational context to both your

  8. 0:27

    human workers and now increasingly your

  9. 0:29

    agents. Okay. So why why is that

  10. 0:32

    important? Before we go too deep on the

  11. 0:34

    mechanics of how a context engine works,

  12. 0:37

    I just want to talk briefly about the

  13. 0:39

    problem.

  14. 0:42

    So, what we're going to do is we're

  15. 0:44

    going to hop into our time machines and

  16. 0:46

    we're going to travel back to the before

  17. 0:48

    times uh before agents and uh discuss a

  18. 0:52

    little bit about what we used to do as

  19. 0:53

    humans uh before agents came into the

  20. 0:56

    picture.

  21. 0:58

    And so for years um you were the context

  22. 1:02

    layer. You um had to go and do things

  23. 1:06

    like this. you had to find things you

  24. 1:09

    were looking for, trolled all over

  25. 1:12

    different data sources, different

  26. 1:14

    discussions taking place. Um, and then

  27. 1:17

    through the codebase of course to try to

  28. 1:18

    build up tribal knowledge and, uh,

  29. 1:21

    throughout time as your code base

  30. 1:24

    progressed, um, you'd be, you know,

  31. 1:27

    fighting incidents and things like that.

  32. 1:29

    And your organization over time builds

  33. 1:31

    up battle scars um from all these all

  34. 1:34

    these different things building code uh

  35. 1:37

    documenting architecture and and dealing

  36. 1:39

    with outages and things like that.

  37. 1:42

    But now um we have a new problem because

  38. 1:46

    uh as we introduce agents to the picture

  39. 1:49

    um they suffer from all of these

  40. 1:52

    challenges except for one thing. Agents

  41. 1:54

    are like new employees.

  42. 1:56

    they reset their knowledge every time

  43. 1:59

    you start a new task. Okay? And so you

  44. 2:03

    can think of an agent like an expert

  45. 2:05

    software engineer um who's a new

  46. 2:08

    employee on boarding for the first time.

  47. 2:11

    Every time they have to rediscover your

  48. 2:12

    code base, how your organization builds

  49. 2:15

    tests um and how they deploy software

  50. 2:18

    with each and every task.

  51. 2:22

    Uh can I just uh put a put a show of

  52. 2:25

    hands for everyone that's seen this

  53. 2:27

    slide before by Vim?

  54. 2:30

    So this is kind of like u this is a good

  55. 2:32

    way to view where people are on what we

  56. 2:34

    call like the AI maturity curve. Um

  57. 2:37

    starting at the the far left uh this is

  58. 2:40

    kind of representative of autocomplete

  59. 2:42

    back in the GBT35 days. You know

  60. 2:45

    remember co-pilot and things like that.

  61. 2:47

    Um and then you know kind of move on to

  62. 2:49

    using cursor. Um and then from there

  63. 2:52

    you're you're think you're talking about

  64. 2:54

    how you can start to solve the context

  65. 2:56

    problem. So some people are building

  66. 2:58

    organizational wikis. Just smile if if

  67. 3:01

    this is kind of um bringing up memories

  68. 3:04

    for you. Um and then you know all these

  69. 3:07

    things are great except that uh how do

  70. 3:11

    you give agents access to this and what

  71. 3:13

    are the compounding problems that the

  72. 3:16

    scaling problems as you move forward

  73. 3:18

    well if you give MCP and skills to your

  74. 3:20

    agents

  75. 3:22

    um to teach them how to navigate and

  76. 3:24

    build context and that's kind of where

  77. 3:28

    uh people are today most people they're

  78. 3:30

    at the sort of stage four to five level

  79. 3:33

    okay

  80. 3:35

    and uh they understand that context is

  81. 3:37

    the bottleneck and they're trying to

  82. 3:39

    build solutions to solve it for their

  83. 3:41

    engineering teams. So looking ahead uh

  84. 3:44

    to all the way to eight with software

  85. 3:47

    factories. This is kind of where the

  86. 3:48

    puck is going. I'm not sure if if folks

  87. 3:51

    were at the keynote this morning, but um

  88. 3:53

    it's it's all about like delivery of

  89. 3:55

    context and unknown and unknowns. And

  90. 3:58

    this becomes increasingly important as

  91. 4:00

    people start thinking about full

  92. 4:02

    automation of agents. they just can't

  93. 4:04

    operate without organizational context.

  94. 4:06

    They get lost.

  95. 4:11

    So, you know, like that's the real

  96. 4:13

    problem. Access to information doesn't

  97. 4:16

    equal understanding. Um I I know that

  98. 4:19

    folks are probably familiar with

  99. 4:20

    claude.md

  100. 4:23

    um and and uh and wiki layouts and all

  101. 4:26

    these things. If you attach a wiki, it

  102. 4:29

    still doesn't tell the agent where the

  103. 4:32

    information is that it needs. It can

  104. 4:35

    search for things in the wiki, but then

  105. 4:37

    what happens is it'll suffer from

  106. 4:39

    something that uh radiologists

  107. 4:42

    uh call satisfaction of search. So, this

  108. 4:44

    is a term in radiology

  109. 4:47

    where you look at an X-ray and you're

  110. 4:49

    trying to find a region um that might be

  111. 4:52

    an indicator for cancer. Okay? And you

  112. 4:55

    discover like one

  113. 4:57

    indicator and if you stop there uh you

  114. 5:01

    might miss other important indicators

  115. 5:03

    that might you know lead to diagnosis of

  116. 5:06

    even more uh issues. So this is what

  117. 5:10

    happens with agents. They don't they

  118. 5:11

    they find something that they they think

  119. 5:13

    is correct and then they stop. Um the

  120. 5:16

    the other thing about agents is that

  121. 5:17

    they don't distill understanding.

  122. 5:20

    They can look around, they can find

  123. 5:22

    information, but they they don't

  124. 5:24

    understand how all the pieces fit

  125. 5:26

    together because without doing that leg

  126. 5:29

    work ahead of time. Um, they don't

  127. 5:31

    understand how, you know, your

  128. 5:32

    dependencies interact with each other

  129. 5:34

    and how your architecture and sort of

  130. 5:36

    future planning is going to scope the

  131. 5:38

    work that it does next. And so some some

  132. 5:41

    people will then ask, well, what if we

  133. 5:43

    just take the entire codebase and all of

  134. 5:45

    our architecture documents and just slam

  135. 5:47

    it into the context window. Um, and then

  136. 5:50

    yes, maybe like your agents will reason

  137. 5:52

    about everything all at once. And in

  138. 5:54

    practice, that that of course doesn't

  139. 5:56

    work. Um, not just because you've got

  140. 5:58

    way more organizational context than can

  141. 6:00

    fit into a context window, even one

  142. 6:02

    that's a million tokens in size. Um, but

  143. 6:06

    it it it causes the agent to get

  144. 6:07

    distracted. When you're working on a

  145. 6:10

    task, you want task specific flow. Um,

  146. 6:13

    and so your agents will get distracted

  147. 6:15

    easily if you give them things that

  148. 6:17

    cause them to look this way in that way.

  149. 6:19

    Um, and it'll just waste tokens and

  150. 6:21

    time. So, in this morning's keynote, um,

  151. 6:25

    Tariq from Claude Code mentioned unknown

  152. 6:28

    unknowns. I just want to uh harp on that

  153. 6:30

    phrase again. And it can be phrased a

  154. 6:32

    different way, which is finding the

  155. 6:34

    things that really matter.

  156. 6:37

    And so this is what your agent can see

  157. 6:39

    at the top of the iceberg. They can see

  158. 6:41

    the code and they can operate on the

  159. 6:44

    code. What they don't see are things

  160. 6:46

    like the actual intent, the team

  161. 6:50

    conventions, past decisions, things that

  162. 6:53

    you've discussed in Slack, for example,

  163. 6:56

    uh architecture rationale, and so on.

  164. 6:59

    And that's why your agents need a

  165. 7:02

    context engine to get real work done.

  166. 7:05

    So, I'm going to now uh attempt a live

  167. 7:08

    demo. And hopefully the demo gods are

  168. 7:10

    kind. Um, so I want to pop back up

  169. 7:14

    conceptually. Oops, I think I'm on the

  170. 7:16

    wrong tab. We'll get to that one in a

  171. 7:17

    sec.

  172. 7:20

    So for now,

  173. 7:24

    sorry about that. And here we are.

  174. 7:29

    So I'm going to ask a question as if I'm

  175. 7:32

    a, you know, I'm a human and I want to

  176. 7:34

    get some information about my codebase.

  177. 7:38

    And, you know, the human layer hasn't

  178. 7:39

    gone away. We talk about agents and

  179. 7:41

    their need for context, but um humans

  180. 7:44

    are still asking questions about the

  181. 7:46

    codebase and we need that level of

  182. 7:47

    understanding because ultimately the

  183. 7:49

    accountability stops with us. When you

  184. 7:52

    hit merge on a PR, you need to

  185. 7:53

    understand what it's doing um and you

  186. 7:55

    need to understand how the architecture

  187. 7:57

    works. So this question I asked here um

  188. 7:59

    is about an internal component of our

  189. 8:02

    system called the source mark engine and

  190. 8:04

    you can see that it uh is able to

  191. 8:07

    articulate it fairly well. um

  192. 8:09

    understands the architecture. This this

  193. 8:11

    diagram here is uh is generated. So it

  194. 8:15

    this diagram doesn't exist. Um it just

  195. 8:19

    figures it out based on the um the way

  196. 8:22

    the code operates today and then some

  197. 8:24

    proposals for future architecture.

  198. 8:27

    And then uh what's really important is

  199. 8:29

    that you show your work. This is a trust

  200. 8:31

    building thing more than anything, but

  201. 8:33

    it allows people to see if um if the

  202. 8:37

    answer is maybe not entirely correct,

  203. 8:39

    then you can in look into the uh the

  204. 8:42

    knowledge base that you have and make

  205. 8:44

    corrections.

  206. 8:45

    Increasingly agents are doing this for

  207. 8:47

    you.

  208. 8:49

    So now um what I want to show you is

  209. 8:52

    another place where humans spend their

  210. 8:54

    time which is in Slack and this is where

  211. 8:58

    a lot of the decisions get made of

  212. 8:59

    course.

  213. 9:00

    So I can do something like this.

  214. 9:04

    And uh unblocked will sit and kind of

  215. 9:06

    listen for things that are things that

  216. 9:08

    can chime in on when it provides a high

  217. 9:10

    degree of Oh, sorry. We went to the

  218. 9:12

    wrong You guys can't see that. Thank

  219. 9:15

    you, Claire.

  220. 9:18

    Oh, come on down. Let's see if I can

  221. 9:20

    bring it up. There we go.

  222. 9:24

    Perfect. So I can ask questions like

  223. 9:27

    this in unblocked and if it thinks it

  224. 9:29

    can chime in on the answer then it will

  225. 9:31

    chime in. Otherwise I can just

  226. 9:34

    um address unblocked directly and ask

  227. 9:37

    the same question

  228. 9:41

    and when it thinks that it has an answer

  229. 9:43

    to give then it will give an answer and

  230. 9:46

    so we can get um

  231. 9:49

    quite a bit of interesting content there

  232. 9:51

    from unblocked. Thank you. Unblocked.

  233. 9:55

    I'm going to switch up

  234. 9:58

    and show you the the really interesting

  235. 10:00

    thing which is the agents. Okay. So, um

  236. 10:03

    in in that question, the source mark

  237. 10:05

    engine, I'm not sure if people picked

  238. 10:06

    up, but there was a little thing at the

  239. 10:08

    bottom there that said, you know,

  240. 10:09

    there's some optimization opportunities.

  241. 10:11

    Um so what I did here is I went into

  242. 10:13

    claw code and I asked it um without

  243. 10:16

    using unblocked to um

  244. 10:19

    uh generate uh a plan to optimize the

  245. 10:23

    source mark calculator and it did that

  246. 10:25

    and it happily went and you know

  247. 10:27

    searched through the code and and tried

  248. 10:28

    to figure out how the algorithm works

  249. 10:30

    and so on. Um and it it reached a

  250. 10:33

    conclusion that's great you know it does

  251. 10:35

    a pretty good job um but you know it

  252. 10:38

    maybe could do a little bit better. So,

  253. 10:40

    I asked that question again uh using

  254. 10:42

    unblock this time and it it really kind

  255. 10:46

    of nails the the nuances because it

  256. 10:48

    picks up on the the uh PRs that we um

  257. 10:53

    where we discussed future possibilities

  258. 10:55

    for improvement. um some Slack

  259. 10:58

    conversations that we had and uh of

  260. 11:01

    course you know notion and architecture

  261. 11:03

    documents and it shows its work and this

  262. 11:05

    is really important because um all of

  263. 11:08

    these things here the sources come back

  264. 11:10

    to Claude and then Claude knows exactly

  265. 11:13

    where to jump to next if it needs to

  266. 11:15

    elaborate on that context. And so I just

  267. 11:18

    want to show you what the impact of that

  268. 11:19

    is. So if I um Whoops.

  269. 11:24

    Thank you. If I pull up usage here, you

  270. 11:26

    can see that with unblocked, uh, the

  271. 11:29

    total cost was, you know, subd dollar to

  272. 11:31

    create the plan. Uh, took about a

  273. 11:33

    minute. Ignore the wall clock time

  274. 11:35

    because I've had this open for about an

  275. 11:36

    hour. But, um, it's about a minute. And

  276. 11:40

    then if I look at um the usage without

  277. 11:43

    unblocked, you can see that it's about 2

  278. 11:46

    minutes. And and and it costs more to

  279. 11:49

    generate all that context. Now, the

  280. 11:50

    reason that happens is because it has to

  281. 11:52

    do more work. It has to look around. has

  282. 11:54

    to discover things. Um, and this

  283. 11:56

    compounds, not only does it have to do

  284. 11:59

    more work to discover things, it doesn't

  285. 12:01

    discover the right things. So, when you

  286. 12:03

    get further down in your execution, it

  287. 12:06

    may be operating on the wrong plan or

  288. 12:08

    the wrong assumptions. And then you have

  289. 12:09

    to go back and you have to loop over and

  290. 12:11

    over again. So, the real value of a

  291. 12:13

    context engine is not like the upfront

  292. 12:15

    cost on these short tasks. It's the

  293. 12:18

    compounding effect. Um the the other

  294. 12:20

    Tariq from Sonar mentioned this in the

  295. 12:23

    keynote this morning and it's true like

  296. 12:25

    the loops compound and you have to be

  297. 12:27

    like um uh efficient the entire way

  298. 12:30

    through with your context. I'm just

  299. 12:32

    going to jump back to

  300. 12:35

    Safari and I'm going to point out um

  301. 12:37

    some really interesting things. So we

  302. 12:41

    also have a a code review agent.

  303. 12:44

    And when we say um you know

  304. 12:47

    organizational context, we're talking

  305. 12:50

    about more than just the underlying

  306. 12:52

    data. Uh we're talking about real

  307. 12:54

    intelligence. So what unblock does is it

  308. 12:58

    looks at um not like it looks at pull

  309. 13:00

    request data and there are other data

  310. 13:02

    sources for this and it generates a

  311. 13:05

    series of best practices that help align

  312. 13:08

    agents to your codebase. But we thought

  313. 13:10

    that this would be really helpful to

  314. 13:11

    surface for the review agent as well. So

  315. 13:14

    what you can see here is um

  316. 13:18

    it unblock chimed in and then Richie

  317. 13:21

    here said, "Oh, that's cool. That's

  318. 13:22

    something I would say." And that's

  319. 13:23

    because that actually was something he

  320. 13:25

    said. So it surfaced the uh the previous

  321. 13:28

    comments. Richie's one of the senior

  322. 13:30

    engineers and we use the sort of

  323. 13:33

    seniority or expertise as a signal um to

  324. 13:37

    boost uh comments that are important.

  325. 13:40

    Okay.

  326. 13:42

    So another uh interesting interaction by

  327. 13:45

    Richie, he uh discovered that the number

  328. 13:48

    of code review issues that were being

  329. 13:50

    surfaced dropped uh precipitously

  330. 13:53

    and he was debugging it with unblocked.

  331. 13:56

    Um he got all the way to the bottom and

  332. 13:58

    realized what roughly what the problem

  333. 14:00

    was and then asked unblocked to fix it.

  334. 14:02

    Now this this is something that we have

  335. 14:04

    internally um you know that we're

  336. 14:07

    experimenting with. Um, so unblocked uh

  337. 14:10

    can run as an agent in the cloud. Um,

  338. 14:13

    but what's really cool about this is

  339. 14:16

    that it has all your organizational

  340. 14:17

    context at its fingertips and the

  341. 14:20

    results are are pretty magical. So it

  342. 14:23

    can do things like generate this PR um,

  343. 14:26

    and then what you'll see here is that

  344. 14:28

    not only does it generate the fix, it

  345. 14:31

    also is able to relate it to the all the

  346. 14:33

    conversations that were happening. So

  347. 14:35

    this PR was created because and you read

  348. 14:37

    that context thing. It's mind-blowing.

  349. 14:39

    After this PR, we switched to uh Claude

  350. 14:43

    48 and it dropped a ton in issues

  351. 14:46

    because of the behavior is quite a bit

  352. 14:48

    different. So then it said Richie

  353. 14:50

    directly correlated the drop. Now what's

  354. 14:52

    this thing here? Let's click on it. It

  355. 14:54

    is a Slack conversation. So, it found

  356. 14:56

    the Slack conversation, correlated all

  357. 14:59

    of that, you know, past history back

  358. 15:01

    again, and then we ended up with a with

  359. 15:03

    a final PR.

  360. 15:08

    So, um, I'm going to I've got only a few

  361. 15:10

    minutes left. I'm just going to close

  362. 15:12

    this out really quickly. We have a uh a

  363. 15:14

    couple of open- source projects that are

  364. 15:16

    kind of interesting if people want to

  365. 15:17

    play with them. One is the document

  366. 15:19

    query engine. That was, uh, something

  367. 15:21

    that I talked about on Monday in my

  368. 15:23

    workshop. Um, I may uh talk about it

  369. 15:26

    again tomorrow, but I just want to give

  370. 15:27

    folks a sense of what this thing does.

  371. 15:30

    Um, whoops.

  372. 15:32

    If you want to play with it, it's open

  373. 15:35

    source, so you can just download it and

  374. 15:36

    have it go. It basically runs over your

  375. 15:39

    um uh GitHub repository, ingests uh your

  376. 15:43

    your historical pull requests, and then

  377. 15:46

    uh synthesizes a schema based on the

  378. 15:48

    documents that it can sample. Um and

  379. 15:51

    then from there you can issue any kind

  380. 15:52

    of queries that you like and get all

  381. 15:54

    kinds of insights out of it through the

  382. 15:57

    agent chat. You can ask all kinds of

  383. 15:59

    questions. Um and then lastly the

  384. 16:02

    engineering social graph. So this is the

  385. 16:04

    thing that I was talking about earlier

  386. 16:06

    that helps us pin down expertise and

  387. 16:09

    team relationships. Um so what you can

  388. 16:12

    see here is this sort of like the rough

  389. 16:14

    breakdown of our team structure at

  390. 16:16

    Unblocked. As you can see we're a fairly

  391. 16:18

    small team. Um and so we've got these um

  392. 16:23

    uh these clusters of people and how they

  393. 16:25

    relate to each other indicates the kind

  394. 16:27

    of um review relationships that they

  395. 16:30

    have. So these are you know these lines

  396. 16:32

    show like we review each other's code.

  397. 16:35

    Um

  398. 16:36

    we can then cluster that and generate

  399. 16:39

    team labels for that or show the

  400. 16:42

    coverage across your codebase. This is

  401. 16:44

    really cool. you can see kind of where

  402. 16:45

    the holes are, where you might be

  403. 16:47

    lacking expert coverage. Um, and that's

  404. 16:50

    exactly what we use within the context

  405. 16:52

    engine itself.

  406. 16:54

    All right,

  407. 17:00

    one last thing we have uh for those that

  408. 17:03

    want a taste of what a context engine

  409. 17:05

    can do but don't want to sign up for

  410. 17:07

    unblocked right away. Um you can use uh

  411. 17:11

    something that we call the context

  412. 17:12

    engine simulator which will basically

  413. 17:15

    build up a context behind the scenes on

  414. 17:18

    a per task basis and then use that

  415. 17:21

    context uh to to drive the task. It'll

  416. 17:24

    do it with context and without context

  417. 17:26

    so that you can see what the differences

  418. 17:28

    might be.

  419. 17:30

    This is a QR code for that if you want

  420. 17:33

    to just take a quick snap.

  421. 17:38

    Awesome. And I'll just land

  422. 17:41

    on a quote from one of our customers.

  423. 17:45

    50% fewer tokens, faster triage, better

  424. 17:49

    answers. And that's exactly what a

  425. 17:51

    context engine can do.

  426. 17:54

    One last shout out um before we end. My

  427. 17:57

    colleague Brandon is giving a talk in

  428. 18:01

    10 minutes uh at room 2020. um he's

  429. 18:04

    going to speak to in a lot more detail

  430. 18:06

    about some of the higher level things

  431. 18:08

    that context engines can do. I'm going

  432. 18:10

    to run over there right after this and I

  433. 18:11

    think all of you should follow me.

  434. 18:14

    Awesome. Oh, and don't forget to get a

  435. 18:16

    coconut.

  436. 18:33

    >> [music]