AI Engineer World's Fair 2026
How to Generate Mergeable Code with a Context Engine — Peter Werry, Unblocked
Read the talk
Generating Mergeable Code with Organizational Context
Peter Werry explains how Unblocked connects code, past decisions, and engineering expertise to help humans and agents plan changes, review code, and investigate failures.
From a talk by Peter Werry
At a glance
Ideas worth remembering
Useful context connects code to intent, conventions, prior decisions, and architecture rationale. Search access alone can leave an agent satisfied with an incomplete answer.
Sources serve two purposes: humans can inspect and correct an explanation, and agents can follow references when they need more detail.
The planning demo reports under one dollar and about one minute with Unblocked, versus about two minutes and greater cost without it. Werry argues that avoiding downstream loops caused by wrong assumptions matters more than the initial saving.
Review history can supply team-specific practices, while expertise signals help prioritize guidance. Mapping review relationships can also reveal areas that lack expert coverage.
The organizational knowledge agents have to rediscover
A context engine delivers organizational context to human workers and agents. Werry starts with the work engineers already did before coding agents: searching across discussions and other data sources, reading the codebase, and assembling enough tribal knowledge to understand a change. Architecture documentation, incidents, and outages all contribute to that knowledge. The resulting understanding accumulates through experience across the organization.
Werry compares an agent starting a task to an expert software engineer joining a company. General engineering ability does not supply knowledge of this particular codebase or its build, test, and deployment practices. In his framing, the agent repeatedly starts over: each task requires another round of discovery. That makes the context engineers once carried in their heads an explicit dependency of agent work.
Suggest correction
This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.
From autocomplete to autonomous work
Werry places this problem on an AI maturity curve. The progression starts with autocomplete and Copilot, moves through tools such as Cursor, and reaches attempts to organize knowledge in wikis. MCP and skills then give agents ways to navigate those resources and build context. He places most teams around stages four to five of the curve, where they recognize context as a bottleneck and are building solutions for their engineers.
At the far end, stage eight represents software factories. Werry argues that increasing automation makes context delivery more consequential: agents need both the information they know to request and relevant information they do not yet know exists. Giving an agent more responsibility increases the importance of supplying organizational knowledge that can guide its decisions.
Suggest correction
This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.
Why access and a larger context window are insufficient
Attaching a wiki gives an agent somewhere to search, but it does not tell the agent which information it needs or when its search is complete. Werry borrows the term “satisfaction of search” from radiology: finding one indicator can cause a search to stop before other consequential indicators are found. His analogy describes an agent accepting a plausible result and stopping before it discovers evidence that could change its answer.
Finding individual facts also leaves the work of connecting them. An agent needs to understand how dependencies interact and how architecture and future plans constrain a proposed change. Werry argues that this understanding requires preparatory work: a collection of retrieved documents does not automatically explain how the pieces fit together.
Putting the entire codebase and all architecture documents into the prompt creates a different problem. Werry gives two objections: organizational context can exceed even a million-token window, and irrelevant material can distract the agent from its task. More information therefore has a cost beyond capacity. It can send the agent into unnecessary investigations that consume tokens and time. The desired input is context selected for the task.
His iceberg analogy identifies what this selection must reach. Code is visible and available for the agent to modify; intent, team conventions, past decisions, Slack discussions, and architecture rationale sit beneath that surface. Finding relevant unknowns means uncovering those constraints and explanations before they become mistakes in the implementation.
Suggest correction
This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.
Explaining architecture and showing the evidence
The first demonstration asks Unblocked about an internal component, the source mark engine. Werry keeps the human use case central: the person merging a pull request remains accountable for understanding its behavior and architecture. He describes an answer that explains the component and generates an architecture diagram from the current code and proposals for future architecture. The diagram is synthesized for the answer rather than retrieved as an existing artifact.
Showing supporting evidence makes that synthesis inspectable. Werry explicitly allows for an answer being partly wrong: a user should be able to follow its sources into the knowledge base and make corrections. The value of provenance is therefore practical as well as trust-building. It provides a route from an explanation back to the material that produced it.
He then moves to Slack, where many team decisions happen. Unblocked can participate when it judges that it can answer a question, or a user can address it directly. This brings access to organizational knowledge into an existing discussion space. The demonstration describes selective participation, but does not specify how the system decides that an answer is strong enough to offer.
Suggest correction
This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.
The same optimization plan with and without context
The component explanation identifies optimization opportunities, which Werry turns into a planning task in Claude Code. Without Unblocked, Claude searches the code, investigates the algorithm, and produces a plan to optimize the source mark calculator. Werry describes this baseline as doing a reasonably good job. With Unblocked, he says the plan captures additional nuances from pull requests discussing future improvements, Slack conversations, Notion, and architecture documents.
The returned sources also guide further investigation. Claude receives references along with the answer, so it has specific places to inspect when it needs more detail. This makes the context response useful beyond its immediate summary: it gives the coding agent a route to the discussions and documents relevant to the next decision.
For this planning example, Werry reports a cost below one dollar and about one minute with Unblocked, compared with about two minutes and a higher cost without it. He distinguishes the approximately one-minute task time from the displayed wall-clock duration, because the session had been open for about an hour. These are reported results for a planning demonstration; they do not establish a general performance guarantee or show the resulting optimization being implemented and merged.
Werry's larger argument concerns compounding work. Discovery takes time, but discovering the wrong information can also produce a faulty plan or assumption. Later execution then builds on that mistake, forcing the agent to return and repeat earlier work. He argues that the more consequential benefit of a context engine is reducing these repeated loops throughout a task, beyond the initial saving in planning time.
Suggest correction
This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.
Learning review practices from the team
The code review agent uses organizational history to derive practices for the codebase. Unblocked examines pull requests and other sources, generates a set of best practices, and makes those practices available during review. This supplies expectations that a team has expressed through previous engineering work.
In the example, a senior engineer named Richie recognizes an automated comment as something he would say. Werry explains that it came from something Richie had previously said. The system uses seniority or expertise as a signal to boost important comments. This is a prioritization mechanism: it gives some historical guidance more influence, although Werry does not specify a scoring formula or describe how conflicting guidance is resolved.
Suggest correction
This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.
Connecting a behavioral regression to its history
A second example begins when Richie notices a sharp drop in the number of issues surfaced by the code review agent. He investigates with Unblocked, reaches an approximate diagnosis, and asks it to fix the problem. Werry describes an internal experiment in which Unblocked runs as a cloud agent and generates a pull request with organizational context available during the work.
The generated pull request connects its fix to earlier conversations. Werry describes a change to a Claude model whose different behavior was associated with the drop in reported issues. The agent finds the Slack conversation in which Richie connected those events and brings that history into the pull request. The example demonstrates traceable reasoning about why a change is needed; the exact model version, patch mechanics, and measured recovery are not established.
Suggest correction
This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.
A task-level comparison and the closing claim
For people who want to explore the approach before signing up for Unblocked, Werry introduces a context engine simulator. It builds context behind the scenes for an individual task, then runs the task with and without that context so users can compare the differences. Its stated purpose is to make the effect of context visible on a task, rather than ask users to infer that effect from a general description.
Werry ends with a customer report of 50% fewer tokens, faster triage, and better answers. The report supplies no workload or evaluation method, so the percentage remains a customer-specific claim. He then points attendees to his colleague Brandon's follow-up talk for more detail on what context engines can do and closes the presentation.
Suggest correction
This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.
Read the complete timestamped transcript
- 0:12
What we do at Unblocks is we build a
- 0:13
context engine. I just want to do a
- 0:15
quick sound check at the back to make
- 0:17
sure everyone can hear me fine. Can you
- 0:18
guys Yeah, we're good. Awesome. So at a
- 0:22
high level, a context engine delivers
- 0:25
organizational context to both your
- 0:27
human workers and now increasingly your
- 0:29
agents. Okay. So why why is that
- 0:32
important? Before we go too deep on the
- 0:34
mechanics of how a context engine works,
- 0:37
I just want to talk briefly about the
- 0:39
problem.
- 0:42
So, what we're going to do is we're
- 0:44
going to hop into our time machines and
- 0:46
we're going to travel back to the before
- 0:48
times uh before agents and uh discuss a
- 0:52
little bit about what we used to do as
- 0:53
humans uh before agents came into the
- 0:56
picture.
- 0:58
And so for years um you were the context
- 1:02
layer. You um had to go and do things
- 1:06
like this. you had to find things you
- 1:09
were looking for, trolled all over
- 1:12
different data sources, different
- 1:14
discussions taking place. Um, and then
- 1:17
through the codebase of course to try to
- 1:18
build up tribal knowledge and, uh,
- 1:21
throughout time as your code base
- 1:24
progressed, um, you'd be, you know,
- 1:27
fighting incidents and things like that.
- 1:29
And your organization over time builds
- 1:31
up battle scars um from all these all
- 1:34
these different things building code uh
- 1:37
documenting architecture and and dealing
- 1:39
with outages and things like that.
- 1:42
But now um we have a new problem because
- 1:46
uh as we introduce agents to the picture
- 1:49
um they suffer from all of these
- 1:52
challenges except for one thing. Agents
- 1:54
are like new employees.
- 1:56
they reset their knowledge every time
- 1:59
you start a new task. Okay? And so you
- 2:03
can think of an agent like an expert
- 2:05
software engineer um who's a new
- 2:08
employee on boarding for the first time.
- 2:11
Every time they have to rediscover your
- 2:12
code base, how your organization builds
- 2:15
tests um and how they deploy software
- 2:18
with each and every task.
- 2:22
Uh can I just uh put a put a show of
- 2:25
hands for everyone that's seen this
- 2:27
slide before by Vim?
- 2:30
So this is kind of like u this is a good
- 2:32
way to view where people are on what we
- 2:34
call like the AI maturity curve. Um
- 2:37
starting at the the far left uh this is
- 2:40
kind of representative of autocomplete
- 2:42
back in the GBT35 days. You know
- 2:45
remember co-pilot and things like that.
- 2:47
Um and then you know kind of move on to
- 2:49
using cursor. Um and then from there
- 2:52
you're you're think you're talking about
- 2:54
how you can start to solve the context
- 2:56
problem. So some people are building
- 2:58
organizational wikis. Just smile if if
- 3:01
this is kind of um bringing up memories
- 3:04
for you. Um and then you know all these
- 3:07
things are great except that uh how do
- 3:11
you give agents access to this and what
- 3:13
are the compounding problems that the
- 3:16
scaling problems as you move forward
- 3:18
well if you give MCP and skills to your
- 3:20
agents
- 3:22
um to teach them how to navigate and
- 3:24
build context and that's kind of where
- 3:28
uh people are today most people they're
- 3:30
at the sort of stage four to five level
- 3:33
okay
- 3:35
and uh they understand that context is
- 3:37
the bottleneck and they're trying to
- 3:39
build solutions to solve it for their
- 3:41
engineering teams. So looking ahead uh
- 3:44
to all the way to eight with software
- 3:47
factories. This is kind of where the
- 3:48
puck is going. I'm not sure if if folks
- 3:51
were at the keynote this morning, but um
- 3:53
it's it's all about like delivery of
- 3:55
context and unknown and unknowns. And
- 3:58
this becomes increasingly important as
- 4:00
people start thinking about full
- 4:02
automation of agents. they just can't
- 4:04
operate without organizational context.
- 4:06
They get lost.
- 4:11
So, you know, like that's the real
- 4:13
problem. Access to information doesn't
- 4:16
equal understanding. Um I I know that
- 4:19
folks are probably familiar with
- 4:20
claude.md
- 4:23
um and and uh and wiki layouts and all
- 4:26
these things. If you attach a wiki, it
- 4:29
still doesn't tell the agent where the
- 4:32
information is that it needs. It can
- 4:35
search for things in the wiki, but then
- 4:37
what happens is it'll suffer from
- 4:39
something that uh radiologists
- 4:42
uh call satisfaction of search. So, this
- 4:44
is a term in radiology
- 4:47
where you look at an X-ray and you're
- 4:49
trying to find a region um that might be
- 4:52
an indicator for cancer. Okay? And you
- 4:55
discover like one
- 4:57
indicator and if you stop there uh you
- 5:01
might miss other important indicators
- 5:03
that might you know lead to diagnosis of
- 5:06
even more uh issues. So this is what
- 5:10
happens with agents. They don't they
- 5:11
they find something that they they think
- 5:13
is correct and then they stop. Um the
- 5:16
the other thing about agents is that
- 5:17
they don't distill understanding.
- 5:20
They can look around, they can find
- 5:22
information, but they they don't
- 5:24
understand how all the pieces fit
- 5:26
together because without doing that leg
- 5:29
work ahead of time. Um, they don't
- 5:31
understand how, you know, your
- 5:32
dependencies interact with each other
- 5:34
and how your architecture and sort of
- 5:36
future planning is going to scope the
- 5:38
work that it does next. And so some some
- 5:41
people will then ask, well, what if we
- 5:43
just take the entire codebase and all of
- 5:45
our architecture documents and just slam
- 5:47
it into the context window. Um, and then
- 5:50
yes, maybe like your agents will reason
- 5:52
about everything all at once. And in
- 5:54
practice, that that of course doesn't
- 5:56
work. Um, not just because you've got
- 5:58
way more organizational context than can
- 6:00
fit into a context window, even one
- 6:02
that's a million tokens in size. Um, but
- 6:06
it it it causes the agent to get
- 6:07
distracted. When you're working on a
- 6:10
task, you want task specific flow. Um,
- 6:13
and so your agents will get distracted
- 6:15
easily if you give them things that
- 6:17
cause them to look this way in that way.
- 6:19
Um, and it'll just waste tokens and
- 6:21
time. So, in this morning's keynote, um,
- 6:25
Tariq from Claude Code mentioned unknown
- 6:28
unknowns. I just want to uh harp on that
- 6:30
phrase again. And it can be phrased a
- 6:32
different way, which is finding the
- 6:34
things that really matter.
- 6:37
And so this is what your agent can see
- 6:39
at the top of the iceberg. They can see
- 6:41
the code and they can operate on the
- 6:44
code. What they don't see are things
- 6:46
like the actual intent, the team
- 6:50
conventions, past decisions, things that
- 6:53
you've discussed in Slack, for example,
- 6:56
uh architecture rationale, and so on.
- 6:59
And that's why your agents need a
- 7:02
context engine to get real work done.
- 7:05
So, I'm going to now uh attempt a live
- 7:08
demo. And hopefully the demo gods are
- 7:10
kind. Um, so I want to pop back up
- 7:14
conceptually. Oops, I think I'm on the
- 7:16
wrong tab. We'll get to that one in a
- 7:17
sec.
- 7:20
So for now,
- 7:24
sorry about that. And here we are.
- 7:29
So I'm going to ask a question as if I'm
- 7:32
a, you know, I'm a human and I want to
- 7:34
get some information about my codebase.
- 7:38
And, you know, the human layer hasn't
- 7:39
gone away. We talk about agents and
- 7:41
their need for context, but um humans
- 7:44
are still asking questions about the
- 7:46
codebase and we need that level of
- 7:47
understanding because ultimately the
- 7:49
accountability stops with us. When you
- 7:52
hit merge on a PR, you need to
- 7:53
understand what it's doing um and you
- 7:55
need to understand how the architecture
- 7:57
works. So this question I asked here um
- 7:59
is about an internal component of our
- 8:02
system called the source mark engine and
- 8:04
you can see that it uh is able to
- 8:07
articulate it fairly well. um
- 8:09
understands the architecture. This this
- 8:11
diagram here is uh is generated. So it
- 8:15
this diagram doesn't exist. Um it just
- 8:19
figures it out based on the um the way
- 8:22
the code operates today and then some
- 8:24
proposals for future architecture.
- 8:27
And then uh what's really important is
- 8:29
that you show your work. This is a trust
- 8:31
building thing more than anything, but
- 8:33
it allows people to see if um if the
- 8:37
answer is maybe not entirely correct,
- 8:39
then you can in look into the uh the
- 8:42
knowledge base that you have and make
- 8:44
corrections.
- 8:45
Increasingly agents are doing this for
- 8:47
you.
- 8:49
So now um what I want to show you is
- 8:52
another place where humans spend their
- 8:54
time which is in Slack and this is where
- 8:58
a lot of the decisions get made of
- 8:59
course.
- 9:00
So I can do something like this.
- 9:04
And uh unblocked will sit and kind of
- 9:06
listen for things that are things that
- 9:08
can chime in on when it provides a high
- 9:10
degree of Oh, sorry. We went to the
- 9:12
wrong You guys can't see that. Thank
- 9:15
you, Claire.
- 9:18
Oh, come on down. Let's see if I can
- 9:20
bring it up. There we go.
- 9:24
Perfect. So I can ask questions like
- 9:27
this in unblocked and if it thinks it
- 9:29
can chime in on the answer then it will
- 9:31
chime in. Otherwise I can just
- 9:34
um address unblocked directly and ask
- 9:37
the same question
- 9:41
and when it thinks that it has an answer
- 9:43
to give then it will give an answer and
- 9:46
so we can get um
- 9:49
quite a bit of interesting content there
- 9:51
from unblocked. Thank you. Unblocked.
- 9:55
I'm going to switch up
- 9:58
and show you the the really interesting
- 10:00
thing which is the agents. Okay. So, um
- 10:03
in in that question, the source mark
- 10:05
engine, I'm not sure if people picked
- 10:06
up, but there was a little thing at the
- 10:08
bottom there that said, you know,
- 10:09
there's some optimization opportunities.
- 10:11
Um so what I did here is I went into
- 10:13
claw code and I asked it um without
- 10:16
using unblocked to um
- 10:19
uh generate uh a plan to optimize the
- 10:23
source mark calculator and it did that
- 10:25
and it happily went and you know
- 10:27
searched through the code and and tried
- 10:28
to figure out how the algorithm works
- 10:30
and so on. Um and it it reached a
- 10:33
conclusion that's great you know it does
- 10:35
a pretty good job um but you know it
- 10:38
maybe could do a little bit better. So,
- 10:40
I asked that question again uh using
- 10:42
unblock this time and it it really kind
- 10:46
of nails the the nuances because it
- 10:48
picks up on the the uh PRs that we um
- 10:53
where we discussed future possibilities
- 10:55
for improvement. um some Slack
- 10:58
conversations that we had and uh of
- 11:01
course you know notion and architecture
- 11:03
documents and it shows its work and this
- 11:05
is really important because um all of
- 11:08
these things here the sources come back
- 11:10
to Claude and then Claude knows exactly
- 11:13
where to jump to next if it needs to
- 11:15
elaborate on that context. And so I just
- 11:18
want to show you what the impact of that
- 11:19
is. So if I um Whoops.
- 11:24
Thank you. If I pull up usage here, you
- 11:26
can see that with unblocked, uh, the
- 11:29
total cost was, you know, subd dollar to
- 11:31
create the plan. Uh, took about a
- 11:33
minute. Ignore the wall clock time
- 11:35
because I've had this open for about an
- 11:36
hour. But, um, it's about a minute. And
- 11:40
then if I look at um the usage without
- 11:43
unblocked, you can see that it's about 2
- 11:46
minutes. And and and it costs more to
- 11:49
generate all that context. Now, the
- 11:50
reason that happens is because it has to
- 11:52
do more work. It has to look around. has
- 11:54
to discover things. Um, and this
- 11:56
compounds, not only does it have to do
- 11:59
more work to discover things, it doesn't
- 12:01
discover the right things. So, when you
- 12:03
get further down in your execution, it
- 12:06
may be operating on the wrong plan or
- 12:08
the wrong assumptions. And then you have
- 12:09
to go back and you have to loop over and
- 12:11
over again. So, the real value of a
- 12:13
context engine is not like the upfront
- 12:15
cost on these short tasks. It's the
- 12:18
compounding effect. Um the the other
- 12:20
Tariq from Sonar mentioned this in the
- 12:23
keynote this morning and it's true like
- 12:25
the loops compound and you have to be
- 12:27
like um uh efficient the entire way
- 12:30
through with your context. I'm just
- 12:32
going to jump back to
- 12:35
Safari and I'm going to point out um
- 12:37
some really interesting things. So we
- 12:41
also have a a code review agent.
- 12:44
And when we say um you know
- 12:47
organizational context, we're talking
- 12:50
about more than just the underlying
- 12:52
data. Uh we're talking about real
- 12:54
intelligence. So what unblock does is it
- 12:58
looks at um not like it looks at pull
- 13:00
request data and there are other data
- 13:02
sources for this and it generates a
- 13:05
series of best practices that help align
- 13:08
agents to your codebase. But we thought
- 13:10
that this would be really helpful to
- 13:11
surface for the review agent as well. So
- 13:14
what you can see here is um
- 13:18
it unblock chimed in and then Richie
- 13:21
here said, "Oh, that's cool. That's
- 13:22
something I would say." And that's
- 13:23
because that actually was something he
- 13:25
said. So it surfaced the uh the previous
- 13:28
comments. Richie's one of the senior
- 13:30
engineers and we use the sort of
- 13:33
seniority or expertise as a signal um to
- 13:37
boost uh comments that are important.
- 13:40
Okay.
- 13:42
So another uh interesting interaction by
- 13:45
Richie, he uh discovered that the number
- 13:48
of code review issues that were being
- 13:50
surfaced dropped uh precipitously
- 13:53
and he was debugging it with unblocked.
- 13:56
Um he got all the way to the bottom and
- 13:58
realized what roughly what the problem
- 14:00
was and then asked unblocked to fix it.
- 14:02
Now this this is something that we have
- 14:04
internally um you know that we're
- 14:07
experimenting with. Um, so unblocked uh
- 14:10
can run as an agent in the cloud. Um,
- 14:13
but what's really cool about this is
- 14:16
that it has all your organizational
- 14:17
context at its fingertips and the
- 14:20
results are are pretty magical. So it
- 14:23
can do things like generate this PR um,
- 14:26
and then what you'll see here is that
- 14:28
not only does it generate the fix, it
- 14:31
also is able to relate it to the all the
- 14:33
conversations that were happening. So
- 14:35
this PR was created because and you read
- 14:37
that context thing. It's mind-blowing.
- 14:39
After this PR, we switched to uh Claude
- 14:43
48 and it dropped a ton in issues
- 14:46
because of the behavior is quite a bit
- 14:48
different. So then it said Richie
- 14:50
directly correlated the drop. Now what's
- 14:52
this thing here? Let's click on it. It
- 14:54
is a Slack conversation. So, it found
- 14:56
the Slack conversation, correlated all
- 14:59
of that, you know, past history back
- 15:01
again, and then we ended up with a with
- 15:03
a final PR.
- 15:08
So, um, I'm going to I've got only a few
- 15:10
minutes left. I'm just going to close
- 15:12
this out really quickly. We have a uh a
- 15:14
couple of open- source projects that are
- 15:16
kind of interesting if people want to
- 15:17
play with them. One is the document
- 15:19
query engine. That was, uh, something
- 15:21
that I talked about on Monday in my
- 15:23
workshop. Um, I may uh talk about it
- 15:26
again tomorrow, but I just want to give
- 15:27
folks a sense of what this thing does.
- 15:30
Um, whoops.
- 15:32
If you want to play with it, it's open
- 15:35
source, so you can just download it and
- 15:36
have it go. It basically runs over your
- 15:39
um uh GitHub repository, ingests uh your
- 15:43
your historical pull requests, and then
- 15:46
uh synthesizes a schema based on the
- 15:48
documents that it can sample. Um and
- 15:51
then from there you can issue any kind
- 15:52
of queries that you like and get all
- 15:54
kinds of insights out of it through the
- 15:57
agent chat. You can ask all kinds of
- 15:59
questions. Um and then lastly the
- 16:02
engineering social graph. So this is the
- 16:04
thing that I was talking about earlier
- 16:06
that helps us pin down expertise and
- 16:09
team relationships. Um so what you can
- 16:12
see here is this sort of like the rough
- 16:14
breakdown of our team structure at
- 16:16
Unblocked. As you can see we're a fairly
- 16:18
small team. Um and so we've got these um
- 16:23
uh these clusters of people and how they
- 16:25
relate to each other indicates the kind
- 16:27
of um review relationships that they
- 16:30
have. So these are you know these lines
- 16:32
show like we review each other's code.
- 16:35
Um
- 16:36
we can then cluster that and generate
- 16:39
team labels for that or show the
- 16:42
coverage across your codebase. This is
- 16:44
really cool. you can see kind of where
- 16:45
the holes are, where you might be
- 16:47
lacking expert coverage. Um, and that's
- 16:50
exactly what we use within the context
- 16:52
engine itself.
- 16:54
All right,
- 17:00
one last thing we have uh for those that
- 17:03
want a taste of what a context engine
- 17:05
can do but don't want to sign up for
- 17:07
unblocked right away. Um you can use uh
- 17:11
something that we call the context
- 17:12
engine simulator which will basically
- 17:15
build up a context behind the scenes on
- 17:18
a per task basis and then use that
- 17:21
context uh to to drive the task. It'll
- 17:24
do it with context and without context
- 17:26
so that you can see what the differences
- 17:28
might be.
- 17:30
This is a QR code for that if you want
- 17:33
to just take a quick snap.
- 17:38
Awesome. And I'll just land
- 17:41
on a quote from one of our customers.
- 17:45
50% fewer tokens, faster triage, better
- 17:49
answers. And that's exactly what a
- 17:51
context engine can do.
- 17:54
One last shout out um before we end. My
- 17:57
colleague Brandon is giving a talk in
- 18:01
10 minutes uh at room 2020. um he's
- 18:04
going to speak to in a lot more detail
- 18:06
about some of the higher level things
- 18:08
that context engines can do. I'm going
- 18:10
to run over there right after this and I
- 18:11
think all of you should follow me.
- 18:14
Awesome. Oh, and don't forget to get a
- 18:16
coconut.
- 18:33
>> [music]