Beyond the Lethal Trifecta: Agentic Commerce on the Open Internet — David Levine, Kiduna Club

Read the talk

Beyond the Lethal Trifecta: Identity, Accountability and Agentic Commerce

David Levine proposes an open internet economy where agents act through registered organizations, carry cryptographic credentials and govern shared work through decision markets. The proposal connects technical authority to legal responsibility, while leaving important questions about security and governance unresolved.

From a talk by David Levine

At a glance

Ideas worth remembering

  • Levine’s organizing principle is composability across governance, technology, economics and culture. His agent economy applies that principle to agents and organizations that can combine capabilities and pursue shared purposes.

  • The lethal trifecta creates a path from untrusted text to actions involving private data. Levine’s alternative combines registered organizational identity, JWT authority claims and blockchain audit trails, but the talk does not demonstrate that these mechanisms prevent prompt injection.

  • In Levine’s legal account, a DUNA can conduct commercial activity and earn profits, while ownership-based distributions to members create securities implications. The practical model therefore depends on how value is shared and reinvested, not simply on whether revenue is earned.

  • Decision markets would let members propose policies and trade pass and fail tokens through agents informed by their values. Levine argues for better decisions through incentives, but leaves the settlement mechanism and evidence of improved outcomes unspecified.

  • The proposed adoption path starts with an umbrella organization and credentials that specify purpose, permissions and lifetime. Wider interoperability depends on participants accepting a common standard and its public registry.

A virtual world built from shared parts

Selected presentation frame from Beyond the Lethal Trifecta: Agentic Commerce on the Open Internet — David Levine, Kiduna Club at 161 seconds
A virtual world built from shared parts

In the conference’s closing session, Levine frames the lethal trifecta as an obstacle to commerce among agents on the open internet. His starting point is a much earlier encounter with online community: at a college roommate’s wedding in November 1993, a friend gave him connection details for a MOO. He bought a 9600 baud modem and joined the text-based world. What held his attention was the sense of inhabiting a community rather than simply reading text.

He attributes that experience to composability. The world consisted of nouns and verbs, and participants could adopt programs as their player classes to gain new behavior. His examples include morphing and turning a scooter into a motorcycle. A contribution could become part of other participants’ capabilities because it operated within the same coherent universe. The apparently expansive world ran on a single workstation at Xerox PARC.

Composability, in this account, extended beyond programs. Governance included an architectural review board and wizards; the technology was shared; Xerox PARC supplied the funding; and culture gave the community its character. Levine’s lesson is that governance, technology, economics and culture worked together. Software alone does not explain why the environment felt like a world.

0:120:24
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

0:01 · section reference included

From coherent communities to platform silos

Selected presentation frame from Beyond the Lethal Trifecta: Agentic Commerce on the Open Internet — David Levine, Kiduna Club at 206 seconds
From coherent communities to platform silos

Levine describes the period from 1995 to 2025 as 30 years in which platforms and algorithms eroded the communities people valued in the early internet. He calls their incentives extractive: a platform can place an advertisement or an engaging distraction ahead of a community interaction because it benefits from attention. His examples are groups on Facebook and LinkedIn, where feed optimization can turn participation into infinite scrolling. This is his diagnosis of why the internet became a collection of silos rather than a connected community economy.

He then describes a surge of interest in agents in January 2026. The resulting difficulty, he argues, was structural: agents were moving through an internet organized around closed platforms, without a suitable framework for their interactions. Other actors could exploit that mismatch. This leads him from the social history of communities to the security problem of agents consuming hostile information.

2:573:00
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

2:57 · section reference included

How outside content becomes an unauthorized action

Selected presentation frame from Beyond the Lethal Trifecta: Agentic Commerce on the Open Internet — David Levine, Kiduna Club at 375 seconds
How outside content becomes an unauthorized action

Levine explains prompt injection as a confusion about who is entitled to instruct an agent. An agent receives a system prompt, context and other text. An attacker tries to make some of that incoming text appear to come from the agent’s principal, then persuades it to send private information elsewhere. The failure occurs when information the agent encounters acquires the authority of an instruction.

The lethal trifecta combines access to private data, exposure to untrusted content and the ability to act. Private data might include bank information, logins, spreadsheets, documents and notes. Outside content might be a genuine job board or a site created to deceive the agent. Action makes the confusion consequential: an agent fills out a form, receives an email, reads it and follows a request to expose a secret. The three capabilities together create a path from an external message to disclosure of internal information.

The enterprise response he describes is to keep agents within controlled systems such as Slack, Salesforce and Notion. That containment carries an integration cost. APIs and MCP servers connect the pieces, but sales, finance and research agents still need substantial work to operate together. Levine argues that context is lost across these boundaries, making confinement a constraint on useful collaboration as well as a response to risk.

4:224:26
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

4:22 · section reference included

Giving an agent organization legal standing

Levine introduces a legal development as the foundation for his alternative. He reports that a West Virginia law took effect the day before the talk and that, about two hours before speaking, he received confirmation from the Secretary of State after sending documents by FedEx. He presents the registration as establishing legal standing for an organization composed of intelligent agents and pauses to mark the occasion with the audience. These are his reported registration and legal conclusions; the presentation does not establish their reach across jurisdictions.

DUNA stands for decentralized unincorporated nonprofit association. Levine describes it as member-governed, composable and permissionless: agents can build on other agents, and participants can connect without the admission controls of a platform. Registration supplies an accountable organizational identity. He says the structure does not require a board of directors, executives or a corporate shell. His additional claims that it is safe and secure are assertions at this point, rather than demonstrated security properties.

The economic distinction matters more than the nonprofit label alone. In Levine’s account, a DUNA can earn profits but cannot distribute them to members based on ownership without securities implications for the membership units. He says value can be shared through other means, but does not specify those arrangements. He also describes powers to own assets and property, enter agreements, raise capital, open bank accounts and hire or fire people. Buying and marketing an apartment building is his illustrative example of what agents acting through such an organization might do, rather than a transaction he demonstrates.

6:486:50
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

6:39 · section reference included

Tracing an agent to a responsible organization

Levine attributes the structure’s design to Andreessen Horowitz’s work for blockchain and DAO projects, then argues that autonomous agents provide an even stronger use case. His proposed role for blockchain is identity and traceability. An agent is associated with an account, and that account connects to a history of processes and movements of money.

The intended consequence is legal accountability: if an agent becomes the subject of litigation, the record should lead back to whoever is responsible for it. Levine makes a broad claim that blockchain cannot be tricked, but the mechanism he describes here is narrower—a traceable association between an account, activity and responsibility. He does not explain how the system establishes that association or ensures that all relevant activity enters the record.

9:369:38
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

9:36 · section reference included

Building agents and organizations as software

Selected presentation frame from Beyond the Lethal Trifecta: Agentic Commerce on the Open Internet — David Levine, Kiduna Club at 772 seconds
Building agents and organizations as software

Levine calls an agent in this economy an ally and calls the associated agentic organization a Kiduna, connecting the DUNA structure with kinship among its participants. He describes ally creation as a sequence of informing, instructing, empowering, enacting and aligning. Informing means placing material in a vector database while retaining an LLM behind the agent. A scientist, programmer, psychotherapist or lawyer can supply domain information that gives the ally its particular knowledge.

Instructing sets the system prompt: the ally’s character, stance and way of interacting with the world. Empowering connects accounts, including enterprise systems, Slack, Telegram and Twitter. Enacting supplies specific abilities and automation, including work toward long-term goals over extended periods. Alignment gives the ally a purpose intended to guide its behavior across contexts. These steps distinguish what the agent knows, how it behaves, what it can reach, what it can do and whom its work serves.

He extends the same approach to the organization itself. Software would embody the organization’s operation: discovering customers, sharing value and reinvesting revenue or profits. Connecting these allies and organizations in flexible combinations is his model of the agentic economy. He presents the recent legal change as enabling this organizational capability, although the passage supplies a design vision rather than an operational demonstration of those business processes.

10:3410:36
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

10:34 · section reference included

Resolving identity, authority and boundaries

Selected presentation frame from Beyond the Lethal Trifecta: Agentic Commerce on the Open Internet — David Levine, Kiduna Club at 848 seconds
Resolving identity, authority and boundaries

Returning to the lethal trifecta, Levine proposes establishing identity, authority and boundaries within and between organizations through cryptographic tokens. He names JWT as the credential format. The intended resolution runs upward from an interacting agent to the registered organization behind it, giving the recipient a way to determine whose agent it is dealing with.

His analogy is the domain name system: a registry anchors the lookup, and an agent’s token resolves to a recognizable organization such as Kaiser Permanente, Disney or Pepsi. Looking up the organization ID would then lead to a blockchain audit trail extending down to a particular action. This joins an organizational identity with an activity record. Levine argues that this prevents agents from fooling one another, but he does not show how authenticated identity governs the interpretation of hostile text or blocks an unauthorized action. The described resolution and audit trail therefore support a more specific accountability claim than a demonstrated elimination of prompt injection.

13:1313:18
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

13:13 · section reference included

Governing through policy markets

Levine identifies two concerns for organizational governance: sustaining the organization’s viability and growth, and serving its mission. He anticipates organizations with hundreds or thousands of people, eventually millions, and proposes decision markets for making policy. Any member can propose a policy; participants trade pass and fail tokens associated with it.

The proposed incentive comes from token value. Levine says participants gain more value when they side with the winning group, and agents can watch prices move as positions change. He argues that reward-oriented agents will make better decisions when their arguments are connected to these stakes. Members would equip agents with their purposes, values, experiences and aspirations, then let them debate. However, he supplies neither a settlement rule nor comparative results: the account does not establish how winning is determined, whether it measures policy success, or how market incentives balance mission against viability.

14:5214:54
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

14:52 · section reference included

An umbrella organization and a shared standard

Levine closes the prepared talk by inviting participants to build agents and organizations around shared purposes. He echoes the invitation that brought him into the MOO in 1993, then describes early access expected in a few weeks. The initial organization is intended for builders, with agentic templates for sales, social media and legal work. Contributors could subsequently spin out organizations for their own purposes. These are the rollout plans he announces at the talk.

In the questions that follow, he clarifies that users would not need to establish a separate organization immediately. The first organization is a broad umbrella under which an agent can register and become traceable. He describes making a JWT credential available through a website or an interaction surface such as Slack. The answer explains the intended onboarding route, although the audience question itself is not available in enough detail to establish its precise concern.

Adoption remains a collective problem. Levine compares the hoped-for agreement on agent credentials to agreement on SMTP and HTTP across previously different systems. His preference is for a Secretary of State’s public office to anchor the registry because it already has legal standing. He sees that as a more practical starting point than persuading many companies to establish a registry together. The proposal consequently combines open participation with a public authority at the root of organizational identity; common acceptance of that arrangement remains an ambition.

16:3516:40
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

16:35 · section reference included

Credentials with specific permissions and lifetimes

The final answer adds an important operational detail: tokens can serve different purposes, have different times to live and specify access to different resources. Levine describes a series of claims that includes a blockchain address and the information needed for lookup and validation before agents begin working together. This makes the credential more than an organizational name—it is intended to communicate a bounded grant of access. He does not provide the claim schema or the rules that enforce those grants.

With time exhausted, Levine offers to continue the discussion outside, thanks the audience and returns to taking a photograph of the people present. The recording ends with that informal celebration and closing music.

20:2520:31
Suggest correction

This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.

20:25 · section reference included

Read the complete timestamped transcript
  1. 0:01

    [music]

  2. 0:12

    >> Okay, well, this is the very last

  3. 0:14

    session of the entire conference. I hope

  4. 0:16

    you guys have had a great time and we're

  5. 0:19

    going to try and keep the energy high

  6. 0:21

    for the very end. So, we're going to

  7. 0:23

    cover

  8. 0:24

    the lethal trifecta

  9. 0:26

    and most importantly how to get past it.

  10. 0:29

    So, for those of you who don't know, the

  11. 0:31

    lethal trifecta is what is keeping us

  12. 0:34

    from having true agentic commerce, a

  13. 0:37

    full economy on the open internet.

  14. 0:42

    So, the agentic economy starts right

  15. 0:45

    here, right now.

  16. 0:47

    And to really explain this, I want to go

  17. 0:49

    way back in time to November 1993 when I

  18. 0:52

    was at the wedding of a college

  19. 0:54

    roommate.

  20. 0:55

    And a friend of mine there gave me this

  21. 0:57

    little piece of paper and said, "You've

  22. 0:58

    got to join us on the MOO."

  23. 1:00

    And that paper said

  24. 1:01

    lambda.park.xerox.com port 8888.

  25. 1:07

    And this being the '90s, I walked down

  26. 1:09

    the block once I got home to Egghead

  27. 1:11

    Software, bought a 9600 baud modem,

  28. 1:14

    plugged it in, and

  29. 1:17

    my old life ended. Um

  30. 1:20

    uh that's a beautiful blonde girl in my

  31. 1:23

    bed and I was sitting there on the MOO

  32. 1:26

    uh in the

  33. 1:27

    coat closet. And the reason was

  34. 1:31

    you had a real sense of community. It

  35. 1:35

    was like the true virtual world where

  36. 1:40

    it was just text, but it didn't feel

  37. 1:42

    like text. And there was a reason for

  38. 1:44

    that, this concept of composability. So,

  39. 1:48

    someone would come up with a cool It was

  40. 1:49

    all just nouns and verbs. Someone would

  41. 1:52

    come up with a really cool program

  42. 1:55

    and everybody would then change their

  43. 1:59

    player class to that program so they

  44. 2:01

    could morph, they could create a

  45. 2:04

    motorcycle out of a scooter, they could

  46. 2:06

    do all kinds of things because it had

  47. 2:09

    coherence within the entire universe.

  48. 2:14

    And all of this was running on this guy

  49. 2:16

    Pavel Curtis' Spark 10

  50. 2:20

    sitting somewhere in Xerox Park. It

  51. 2:22

    seemed like this infinite world, but it

  52. 2:23

    was just this little box.

  53. 2:26

    And this was big enough that there were

  54. 2:29

    books written about it like my friend

  55. 2:31

    Julian Dibell wrote My Tiny Life.

  56. 2:33

    The magic came from four things all

  57. 2:36

    composing together. The governance, how

  58. 2:39

    it was run, there was an architectural

  59. 2:41

    review board, wizards, etc. The

  60. 2:43

    technology was all right there. The

  61. 2:47

    economics, it was all funded by Xerox

  62. 2:49

    Park, and the culture was most

  63. 2:52

    important. A lot of people don't really

  64. 2:55

    think about or understand culture.

  65. 2:57

    So what happened between 1995

  66. 3:00

    and 2025? Over the course of 30 years,

  67. 3:03

    all of these communities, all the things

  68. 3:06

    that in the early days of the internet

  69. 3:08

    people really loved just got crushed by

  70. 3:11

    platforms. They got crushed by

  71. 3:13

    algorithms.

  72. 3:15

    Because platforms and algorithms are by

  73. 3:19

    their very nature extractive. They look

  74. 3:22

    for whatever value they can remove from

  75. 3:25

    whatever that community is. So if you

  76. 3:26

    have a group on Facebook or LinkedIn or

  77. 3:29

    wherever, what they're doing is saying,

  78. 3:31

    "Okay,

  79. 3:32

    this advertising message is more

  80. 3:34

    important or I can keep this person more

  81. 3:36

    engaged if I put in this dancing person

  82. 3:40

    and it just leads to the infinite scroll

  83. 3:44

    and not real connection. So there is no

  84. 3:49

    real economy of the internet anymore.

  85. 3:51

    It's just a bunch of siloed platforms.

  86. 3:54

    Now, people suddenly thought, "Okay, I

  87. 3:57

    really have something." In January 2026,

  88. 4:00

    Open Cloud, which had been available for

  89. 4:02

    quite a few months, suddenly blew up.

  90. 4:05

    And

  91. 4:08

    something weird happened because the

  92. 4:10

    internet wasn't really designed for all

  93. 4:12

    these agents running around. It was

  94. 4:14

    still designed for these closed

  95. 4:16

    platforms.

  96. 4:18

    So, other agents and miners took

  97. 4:20

    advantage of that.

  98. 4:22

    They did what we call prompt injections.

  99. 4:26

    An agent is incredibly naive. It takes

  100. 4:30

    It doesn't do much except take

  101. 4:32

    information in as a prompt. Now,

  102. 4:34

    normally that information is several

  103. 4:36

    pieces. There's a system prompt, there's

  104. 4:39

    context, there's words, but it's very

  105. 4:42

    easy to hijack by putting

  106. 4:45

    convincing this

  107. 4:47

    naive agent that your its principal and

  108. 4:51

    convincing it to take that private data

  109. 4:54

    and send it someplace else.

  110. 4:57

    So, this is what we call, well, Simon

  111. 5:00

    William Willison came up with this term,

  112. 5:03

    the lethal trifecta. So, you have your

  113. 5:05

    computer

  114. 5:07

    with

  115. 5:09

    your private data, your bank account

  116. 5:10

    information, your logins, um

  117. 5:13

    all kinds of spreadsheets, documents,

  118. 5:17

    memos, your notepad, and

  119. 5:20

    your agents have access to that. And

  120. 5:23

    then there's all this content out there

  121. 5:25

    on the internet,

  122. 5:27

    which is basically untrusted. I mean,

  123. 5:28

    you you you see all these websites it's

  124. 5:31

    searching, but it's very hard for an

  125. 5:33

    agent to know that that's a real job

  126. 5:36

    board versus someone has put something

  127. 5:38

    up to fool it. They really don't know.

  128. 5:41

    And then they can take actions. So, they

  129. 5:44

    fill out a form, an email comes in, that

  130. 5:47

    email they read and all of a sudden it

  131. 5:50

    tells them to expose some secret. So,

  132. 5:53

    there's really no way to solve this.

  133. 5:56

    Except, so what did enterprises do? They

  134. 5:59

    basically said, "Okay, we're keeping

  135. 6:02

    our agents within the enterprise. So,

  136. 6:05

    you have your your agents in Slack and

  137. 6:07

    your agents in Salesforce and your

  138. 6:08

    agents in Notion and your agents in all

  139. 6:11

    these different things. Then you have to

  140. 6:12

    do all this work with APIs and MCP

  141. 6:15

    servers to try and integrate all of

  142. 6:18

    these pieces,

  143. 6:20

    but you lose a ton of context. You don't

  144. 6:24

    there's no

  145. 6:26

    you basically have your sales agents and

  146. 6:28

    you have your finance agents and you

  147. 6:30

    have your research agents, but it just

  148. 6:33

    takes a huge amount of work to figure

  149. 6:35

    out how do we get this all together.

  150. 6:39

    This was a problem literally until

  151. 6:42

    today.

  152. 6:44

    And this is

  153. 6:45

    the miracles of synchronicity, but

  154. 6:48

    there's a new law

  155. 6:50

    in the state of West Virginia, but

  156. 6:52

    applicable globally,

  157. 6:54

    that went into effect yesterday.

  158. 6:57

    And about 2 hours before

  159. 7:01

    uh

  160. 7:02

    I'm here, I got I FedExed the documents

  161. 7:06

    and I got this reply from the Secretary

  162. 7:08

    of State saying, "We have registered

  163. 7:11

    your DUNA

  164. 7:13

    with the Secretary of State's office and

  165. 7:15

    you have this organization number

  166. 7:17

    628407.

  167. 7:20

    So, now we have legal standing for an

  168. 7:25

    organization composed of intelligent

  169. 7:28

    agents. And again, there aren't very

  170. 7:31

    many people here. The end of the thing

  171. 7:32

    I'm going to take a picture because this

  172. 7:34

    is historic and it's um it's going to be

  173. 7:36

    cool that we said 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18

  174. 7:41

    20 21 people

  175. 7:44

    um got to experience this moment. So,

  176. 7:47

    what is a Duna?

  177. 7:49

    It's a true internet native agentic

  178. 7:53

    organization. It stands for

  179. 7:54

    decentralized

  180. 7:56

    unincorporated

  181. 7:58

    nonprofit association.

  182. 8:01

    And these organizations can build the

  183. 8:04

    agentic economy.

  184. 8:06

    They're composable

  185. 8:08

    which means well, we know what that

  186. 8:11

    means. You can build agents on top of

  187. 8:13

    other agents. Permissionless.

  188. 8:15

    It's not like Facebook or your bank

  189. 8:18

    where someone can tell you if you're

  190. 8:19

    banned or not banned. You can have an

  191. 8:21

    account or not banned. Anybody can

  192. 8:22

    connect.

  193. 8:24

    They're accountable. They're registered

  194. 8:26

    somewhere. They're safe and they're

  195. 8:28

    secure. So, the things that they're not,

  196. 8:30

    you don't need a board of directors, you

  197. 8:31

    don't need any executives.

  198. 8:34

    There's no corporate shell.

  199. 8:36

    One thing that's important you can be

  200. 8:38

    very profitable, but you can't

  201. 8:40

    distribute profits to members. If you

  202. 8:43

    did that, then the membership units

  203. 8:47

    would be securities. It would be like

  204. 8:48

    selling membership units in an LLC or

  205. 8:52

    selling membership units in a C corp or

  206. 8:56

    selling stock in a C corp. So, there are

  207. 8:59

    plenty of still ways to distribute there

  208. 9:01

    that value. You can't do it based on

  209. 9:03

    ownership. So, what is it? That's what

  210. 9:06

    it's not. It's member governed.

  211. 9:08

    You have full legal standing. You can

  212. 9:11

    own assets and property. So, your agents

  213. 9:14

    can go out and literally

  214. 9:16

    buy an apartment building and market it.

  215. 9:19

    You know, you can design agents in ways

  216. 9:21

    you were never able to do before. Can

  217. 9:23

    enter into agreements. You can raise

  218. 9:25

    capital.

  219. 9:27

    You can earn profits. You can open bank

  220. 9:29

    accounts, hire people, fire them. And

  221. 9:32

    very importantly, this is all blockchain

  222. 9:34

    verified.

  223. 9:36

    Now, this was designed by Andreessen

  224. 9:38

    Horowitz for the blockchain.

  225. 9:41

    And what was really interesting for

  226. 9:43

    DAOs, for crypto projects, but what I

  227. 9:47

    found was that this is even better for

  228. 9:50

    autonomous agents than it is for

  229. 9:52

    blockchains. A lot of people say

  230. 9:54

    blockchains are a solution looking for a

  231. 9:57

    problem. Well, they've finally found the

  232. 10:00

    problem, which is verifying agentic

  233. 10:02

    identity. Because you can't trick the

  234. 10:04

    blockchain. They you know,

  235. 10:06

    when an agent is associated with a

  236. 10:09

    particular account on the blockchain,

  237. 10:12

    you can resolve that account to a whole

  238. 10:15

    process that went from here to here, the

  239. 10:18

    money went from here to here. If someone

  240. 10:20

    sues an agent in court, you can trace it

  241. 10:23

    back to who is responsible for that

  242. 10:26

    agent. So, it just opens up a whole

  243. 10:28

    world of possibility in terms of the

  244. 10:32

    agentic economy.

  245. 10:34

    So, here it is in a really simple way.

  246. 10:36

    We call agents within the agentic

  247. 10:40

    economy allies. So, you have an ally.

  248. 10:44

    And you also have an agentic

  249. 10:46

    organization, which we call a kiduna.

  250. 10:49

    So, it's based on a

  251. 10:51

    duna, and then we added the kinship

  252. 10:54

    because these are all related. So, it's

  253. 10:56

    a kiduna.

  254. 10:58

    Now, your you create your ally

  255. 11:03

    very simply. You inform it, which means

  256. 11:06

    you put a bunch of material into the

  257. 11:08

    vector database. You infuse it with

  258. 11:10

    wisdom. So, it it knows all about what

  259. 11:13

    you want it to know about. Now, it still

  260. 11:15

    has

  261. 11:16

    you know, whatever LLM you want behind

  262. 11:18

    it, but what's really important about

  263. 11:20

    this is the the information that you

  264. 11:22

    give it if you're a scientist or a

  265. 11:24

    programmer or a psychotherapist or a

  266. 11:27

    lawyer,

  267. 11:28

    you can give it all all information that

  268. 11:30

    you have. Then you instruct it. That's

  269. 11:32

    basically setting up the system prompt,

  270. 11:34

    giving it its character, its stance,

  271. 11:36

    knowing who he is, who it is, she is,

  272. 11:40

    how they

  273. 11:42

    interact with the world. Then you

  274. 11:44

    empower it. You connect up all your

  275. 11:45

    accounts, your enterprise accounts, your

  276. 11:48

    uh Slack, your Telegram, your Twitter.

  277. 11:52

    Um then you set up in enact is giving it

  278. 11:57

    specific abilities and automation. So,

  279. 11:59

    you can do very deep agents, long-term

  280. 12:02

    goals that it works for extended periods

  281. 12:05

    of time. And finally, alignment. Really

  282. 12:08

    giving it a purpose

  283. 12:10

    so that

  284. 12:11

    your ally in different contexts works

  285. 12:15

    for you in the way that you want it to.

  286. 12:19

    Then your organizations get really cool

  287. 12:22

    cuz you're building software, but you're

  288. 12:24

    building your company, your organization

  289. 12:27

    literally as software. It's not

  290. 12:31

    Okay, I have software and then I have

  291. 12:32

    all these people and all the people have

  292. 12:35

    to sign paperwork. This is really

  293. 12:36

    designing the entire organization as

  294. 12:39

    software. So, it can discover new

  295. 12:41

    customers, share value. When you have

  296. 12:43

    profits, when you have revenue, you can

  297. 12:45

    reinvest it. It just all works in a

  298. 12:48

    completely new way.

  299. 12:50

    So, then the agentic economy is just

  300. 12:52

    connecting all these allies and

  301. 12:54

    organizations in all these new

  302. 12:57

    completely flexible ways. And

  303. 13:01

    this

  304. 13:02

    this whole capability did not exist

  305. 13:04

    until yesterday. And today we have the

  306. 13:07

    first actual uh

  307. 13:10

    agentic uh organizations.

  308. 13:13

    So, resolving the lethal trifecta. What

  309. 13:16

    happens? The

  310. 13:18

    The lethal trifecta was private data

  311. 13:22

    going meeting untrusted content and then

  312. 13:25

    taking actions on that content, which

  313. 13:28

    can then reveal your private data and

  314. 13:30

    cause all kinds of chaos.

  315. 13:32

    So, here

  316. 13:34

    these

  317. 13:35

    agents at a deep level establish

  318. 13:38

    identity, authority, and boundaries

  319. 13:41

    within an organization, between

  320. 13:43

    organizations. How do we do that? With

  321. 13:46

    cryptographic tokens. So, we just use

  322. 13:49

    JWT, extremely simple, the whole web

  323. 13:52

    runs on JWT tokens. And they just do

  324. 13:56

    that very quickly so that they know

  325. 13:59

    who where it all goes up. So, ultimately

  326. 14:02

    at the top level, what organization is

  327. 14:05

    registered? And this becomes a lot like

  328. 14:08

    the domain name system. So, all of a

  329. 14:10

    sudden, the Secretary of State of West

  330. 14:13

    Virginia is like, I can

  331. 14:16

    and saying, okay, you can resolve it to

  332. 14:21

    uh Kaiser Permanente or Disney or Pepsi.

  333. 14:25

    You know, not some fentanyl dealer from

  334. 14:27

    North Korea. However, you know, they

  335. 14:30

    can't fool each other because they're

  336. 14:32

    resolving these tokens that are

  337. 14:33

    ultimately registered with an authority.

  338. 14:37

    And you can you can look up by name and

  339. 14:40

    say, okay, organization ID. Well, if I

  340. 14:42

    go to that organization, it's got it'll

  341. 14:44

    have an audit trail on the blockchain

  342. 14:47

    all the way down to this action that was

  343. 14:49

    taken here.

  344. 14:52

    So, governance in the agentic economy is

  345. 14:54

    extremely important.

  346. 14:57

    Because every organization really is

  347. 15:00

    always focused on two different things,

  348. 15:02

    and both of those things are extremely

  349. 15:04

    important. One of that of those things

  350. 15:08

    is sustainability, growth,

  351. 15:11

    its own viability as an organization,

  352. 15:14

    but it the other is what's its mission?

  353. 15:17

    And these organizations might have

  354. 15:20

    hundreds, thousands of people,

  355. 15:22

    eventually millions of people. And so,

  356. 15:25

    we use a technology called decision

  357. 15:27

    markets, which is very much like

  358. 15:29

    prediction markets, like polymarket.

  359. 15:33

    Yet, instead so they trade pass and fail

  360. 15:35

    tokens on policies. Any member can

  361. 15:38

    propose a policy.

  362. 15:40

    What's really interesting is, instead of

  363. 15:43

    saying, um

  364. 15:45

    "Well, I'm persuaded. I'm going to vote

  365. 15:47

    for this." It's not votes. They actually

  366. 15:50

    trade pass and fail tokens. So, LLMs are

  367. 15:54

    always goal-oriented. They want rewards.

  368. 15:57

    They want to win. And you actually get

  369. 15:59

    better decisions if they're not just

  370. 16:02

    convincing each other, but ultimately

  371. 16:05

    they're they're

  372. 16:07

    you get more value. Your tokens are

  373. 16:09

    worth more if you side with the winning

  374. 16:12

    group. So, they sort of see them going

  375. 16:14

    back and forth and what the value of the

  376. 16:16

    tokens are.

  377. 16:17

    So, it's and apparently, all this

  378. 16:20

    science says you reach much better

  379. 16:21

    decisions this way. By infusing the

  380. 16:24

    agents with your purpose, with your

  381. 16:27

    values, with your experiences, with your

  382. 16:29

    aspirations, and then let them argue

  383. 16:31

    instead of, you know, someone convincing

  384. 16:33

    you of something.

  385. 16:35

    So, we're right now

  386. 16:38

    in this wonderful

  387. 16:40

    back small communities who are getting

  388. 16:43

    together for purposes, and we can now

  389. 16:46

    build this agentic economy together.

  390. 16:48

    Nobody can say how to do it. It's really

  391. 16:51

    up to us. Build your agents, build your

  392. 16:53

    organizations.

  393. 16:56

    So, now, just like my friend Matthew

  394. 17:00

    Pahr gave me this little scrap of paper

  395. 17:03

    uh way back in November 1993 at my

  396. 17:07

    roommate Van's wedding, I'm saying,

  397. 17:09

    "Here's your invitation to join us." And

  398. 17:13

    um

  399. 17:14

    you know, let's let's blow this whole

  400. 17:16

    thing up. Let's uh really make it work.

  401. 17:19

    So, it's [REDACTED:email_address].

  402. 17:22

    You can reach me.

  403. 17:24

    LinkedIn, um it's {slash} motodave.

  404. 17:29

    Um I probably haven't updated my

  405. 17:30

    LinkedIn in 5 or 6 years. But, um

  406. 17:33

    if you go to kaduna.club, you can sign

  407. 17:35

    up for early access. And in just a few

  408. 17:38

    weeks, you'll be the very very first

  409. 17:40

    people

  410. 17:41

    who will be building this first um

  411. 17:45

    uh this first Kaduna, as it's called, is

  412. 17:49

    for builders. It's very specifically for

  413. 17:51

    builders. We have templates, all kinds

  414. 17:53

    of different agentic templates um to

  415. 17:56

    say, you know, I'm going to build my

  416. 17:58

    sales agents, I'm going to build my

  417. 18:00

    uh social media agents, I'm going to

  418. 18:02

    build my lawyer agents. And we really

  419. 18:05

    want a whole bunch of different people

  420. 18:06

    in there contributing to this cuz then

  421. 18:08

    you can spin out your own organization

  422. 18:10

    for all kinds of purposes.

  423. 18:12

    Um I purposefully went through this

  424. 18:14

    fairly quickly so that I could take a

  425. 18:16

    couple questions if anyone

  426. 18:18

    if anyone has them.

  427. 18:21

    Yes.

  428. 18:28

    Can you just stand up and yell a little

  429. 18:29

    loud?

  430. 18:46

    Okay, I'm going to One more time.

  431. 18:50

    Mhm.

  432. 18:53

    Yes. So, the idea is the reason we I set

  433. 18:56

    up this first very broad um

  434. 18:59

    uh organization is because anybody can

  435. 19:02

    just register it. You can just say, my

  436. 19:04

    agent is part of an organization, and

  437. 19:07

    it'll trace to it. So, you don't have to

  438. 19:09

    set up your own organization. The first

  439. 19:11

    one is just a big umbrella organization.

  440. 19:13

    So, that kind of So, it's the idea of

  441. 19:16

    now in the open internet, anybody can

  442. 19:18

    just get a code. So, these are just JWT

  443. 19:22

    tokens. I can put it on my website. I

  444. 19:24

    can put it here. I can say if you want

  445. 19:26

    to interact with my agent on Slack or

  446. 19:28

    wherever,

  447. 19:30

    people will just at at a certain point

  448. 19:32

    we're going to have to get the message

  449. 19:33

    out, but it's sort of like email at the

  450. 19:35

    beginning. You know, people had to know

  451. 19:37

    that SMTP, like people were on all kinds

  452. 19:40

    of different mail systems. At some point

  453. 19:42

    they agreed, "Okay, we're going to use

  454. 19:44

    SMTP." Everyone was, you know, using

  455. 19:47

    different FTP servers and some people

  456. 19:49

    were using different ways to do file and

  457. 19:51

    everyone sort of agreed at some point on

  458. 19:53

    HTTP. So, my hope is that I mean,

  459. 19:58

    someone's got to do it and it makes more

  460. 20:00

    sense for

  461. 20:02

    a state, a secretary of state, which has

  462. 20:06

    standing in a public office to be that

  463. 20:09

    registry rather than trying to get all

  464. 20:12

    these different companies together and

  465. 20:13

    say, "Here's how to do it."

  466. 20:25

    Yes, it each um

  467. 20:29

    we're just at the end of this, so let's

  468. 20:31

    talk out out front, but basically the

  469. 20:33

    idea is you can create all kinds of

  470. 20:35

    different tokens for different purposes

  471. 20:37

    and you can set different times to live.

  472. 20:40

    You can say what it has access to. You

  473. 20:43

    can give it access to different things.

  474. 20:45

    The idea is just it's more the standard

  475. 20:48

    and you set a series of claims and it

  476. 20:50

    says it gives a blockchain address. It

  477. 20:53

    gives all the information you need so it

  478. 20:56

    can look up and validate before you say,

  479. 20:59

    "Okay, now we're starting to work

  480. 21:01

    together."

  481. 21:03

    Okay?

  482. 21:04

    So, thanks so much and uh if anyone

  483. 21:06

    appreciate it. I guess I'll let me do

  484. 21:08

    this uh picture.

  485. 21:10

    Um

  486. 21:12

    uh so we can

  487. 21:14

    see all the people.

  488. 21:17

    All right.

  489. 21:20

    You're all going to be famous someday.

  490. 21:21

    Thanks.

  491. 21:35

    >> [music]