Beyond the Lethal Trifecta: Agentic Commerce on the Open Internet — David Levine, Kiduna Club
Read the talk
Beyond the Lethal Trifecta: Agentic Commerce on the Open Internet
David Levine connects the composable world of LambdaMOO to Kiduna Club’s proposed agentic economy: agents with organizational identity, scoped authority, traceable actions, and member governance. The central question is how those pieces could let agents work across the open internet without surrendering private data or accountability.
From a talk by David Levine
At a glance
Ideas worth remembering
Composability needs a shared social arrangement as well as reusable programs. LambdaMOO joined technology, governance, funding, and culture; Kiduna tries to assemble those dimensions around agents.
The lethal trifecta creates a path from untrusted text to private-data disclosure when an agent accepts that text as authorized direction and can act on it.
Kiduna proposes JWT claims that resolve to registered organizations, with blockchain records connecting actions to responsibility. Preventing prompt injection also requires enforcing authority and access limits before execution.
The closing questions clarify the participation model: individuals can start under an umbrella organization, while different tokens define purposes, access, and lifetimes.
From community to platform enclosures
Levine reads the thirty years from 1995 to 2025 as a loss of that coherence. In his account, platforms redirect community activity toward advertising and engagement: an advertisement takes priority over a group’s conversation, or a distracting item wins placement because it keeps someone scrolling. His objection concerns who sets the objective. The community creates relationships and value, while the platform chooses which activity to amplify.
Agents introduce a new possibility for connecting work across those enclosures, but they also encounter an internet full of material that can try to redirect them. The transition into prompt injection follows directly from the platform problem: connecting more systems is useful only if an agent can preserve whose purposes it serves while reading content supplied by someone else.
Suggest correction
This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.
How the trifecta turns reading into disclosure
The lethal trifecta, a term Levine credits to Simon Willison, combines three capabilities. Each is useful for an assistant; together they create a path from hostile text to consequential action.
- Private data: The agent can reach bank information, logins, spreadsheets, documents, memos, or notes.
- Untrusted content: It reads websites and messages whose authors may be trying to fool it. A page resembling a job board does not establish that its instructions are legitimate.
- Ability to act: It can fill out forms or send information elsewhere, turning a mistaken interpretation into an external effect.
Follow the form-and-email example. An agent fills out a form, an email arrives, and the agent reads it as part of the task. The email then tells it to expose a secret. The critical change occurs when the agent treats the message’s author as its principal—the party entitled to direct its work. Text received as task material becomes an instruction, access to private information supplies the secret, and an action sends it away. This is an illustrative attack sequence in the talk, rather than a demonstrated incident.
Where does the disclosure become possible? The flow below separates the incoming message from the two capabilities it recruits. Reading hostile text alone is different from allowing that text to direct access and transmission.
The enterprise response Levine describes is to keep agents within familiar systems: Slack, Salesforce, Notion, and other internal tools. Sales, finance, and research agents then need APIs and MCP servers to connect their work. The tradeoff is integration effort and lost context. Containment reduces exposure to the open internet, while making the shared environment that LambdaMOO provided much harder to assemble.
Arrives after the agent fills out a form; contains a request to expose a secret.
The attack works when received content is accepted as direction from the principal. Private-data access and an outbound action then complete the path.
Suggest correction
This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.
Giving the organization legal standing
At this point, the talk turns from containment to organizational identity. Levine reports that a West Virginia law had taken effect the previous day and that, roughly two hours before his presentation, the Secretary of State confirmed registration of his DUNA. He treats the registration as a way to connect an organization operated through agents to legal standing and responsibility.
DUNA stands for Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association. In Levine’s account, it is member-governed and does not require a conventional board or executive hierarchy. He describes capacities including owning property, entering agreements, raising capital, earning profits, opening bank accounts, and hiring people. The apartment-building example makes the intended consequence concrete: agents could carry out purchasing and marketing work for an organization with legal existence. These are his legal interpretation and proposed uses; the talk does not establish that registration alone grants each agent authority to undertake them or makes the arrangement applicable in every jurisdiction.
The economic constraint matters to the design. Levine distinguishes earning profits from distributing profits to members because they hold membership units. He says ownership-based distributions would make those units securities, comparing them with interests in an LLC or shares in a corporation. Revenue can instead support continuing work and reinvestment. The proposed organization therefore needs an economic model that pays for contributions and operations without treating membership as a claim on distributed profits.
Blockchain enters as the record connecting agent accounts, actions, and responsibility. Associate an agent with an account, trace the process and movement of money, and follow those records back if an action leads to a lawsuit. Levine’s enthusiasm is that blockchain has found a concrete agentic use: making identity and activity traceable. The intended benefit is a chain of accountability beneath the agent’s work.
Suggest correction
This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.
Building an ally—and an organization—as software
Kiduna calls its agents allies. A Kiduna is the agentic organization around them, combining DUNA with kinship to emphasize their relationships. Creating an ally has several distinct parts; choosing the underlying LLM is only one of the decisions.
- Inform: Put relevant material into a vector database. A scientist, programmer, psychotherapist, or lawyer supplies the knowledge the ally should draw on.
- Instruct: Set the system prompt to define character, stance, and how the ally interacts with the world.
- Empower: Connect accounts and external systems, such as enterprise tools, Slack, Telegram, or Twitter.
- Enact: Give the ally particular abilities and automations, including work toward goals over extended periods.
- Align: Give it a purpose that should guide its behavior across different contexts.
These parts separate knowledge, instructions, access, execution, and purpose. Connecting an account supplies reach; abilities and automation specify work it can perform; purpose supplies the intended direction. Levine then extends the same idea to the organization. Customer discovery, value sharing, revenue, and reinvestment become processes designed in software. Connecting allies and organizations would let those processes compose across groups, much as shared programs composed inside LambdaMOO.
Suggest correction
This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.
Tokens connect actions to registered organizations
The proposed answer to the trifecta is to establish identity, authority, and limits within and between organizations. Levine uses JWT cryptographic tokens as the carrier. An interaction should resolve upward to a registered organization, while a blockchain audit trail connects the organization downward to particular actions. His analogy is DNS: a name resolves through a recognized registry rather than relying on how convincingly someone presents themselves.
What must be connected before two agents work together? The diagram shows the two directions of the proposal: claims lead toward organizational identity, and records lead toward an action’s history. The closing questions add the practical detail that tokens can carry access claims, a blockchain address, and different lifetimes.
Return to the malicious email. Its assertion that it speaks for the principal would have to be evaluated against identity and permitted access before collaboration or action. That is the intended change from obeying persuasive text. However, verified identity and traceable activity do not by themselves establish that an agent will reject malicious instructions: the proposal’s security depends on checks that enforce the claimed authority and access limits before execution. The talk describes token resolution and validation, without demonstrating that the full attack sequence is prevented.
Different tokens can serve different purposes.
Kiduna’s proposed interaction connects token claims to a registered organization and uses blockchain records to trace particular actions. Validation precedes working together.
Suggest correction
This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.
Decision markets for member governance
An organization has to remain viable while serving its mission. Levine identifies sustainability and growth alongside purpose as the two concerns governance must reconcile, especially if membership grows from hundreds or thousands toward millions. His proposed mechanism is decision markets, resembling prediction markets but organized around policies.
Any member can propose a policy. Participants trade pass and fail tokens instead of simply casting votes. Positions and token values change as the discussion develops, and Levine describes a reward for siding with the winning group. The intended incentive is to make agents put value behind their positions rather than only generate persuasive arguments. People supply purpose, values, experience, and aspirations; agents then deliberate with those inputs.
The important distinction is between rewarding a winning position and establishing that the resulting policy serves the mission. Levine claims decision markets produce better decisions, but the talk supplies neither a comparative study nor the settlement and ratification rules that would explain how that claim holds here. The mechanism described is an incentive proposal for collective deliberation, with decision quality still dependent on how the market and governance rules are designed.
Suggest correction
This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.
An umbrella first, then a standard others can adopt
The invitation returns to the scrap of paper from 1993. Levine describes the first Kiduna as a community for builders, with templates for sales, social-media, and lawyer agents. Participants would contribute capabilities and eventually spin out organizations for other purposes. Early access is presented as forthcoming within a few weeks of the recording, so the invitation concerns a developing ecosystem rather than an established universal protocol.
An audience question exposes the onboarding issue: how does an individual participate without creating a legal organization? The first organization is intended to be a broad umbrella. A person could register their agent as part of it, giving the agent an organizational identity to trace back to. Membership in this shared organization is the proposed starting route; forming a separate organization is optional.
The token could be presented through a website or an agent interaction in Slack. Adoption still requires other participants to recognize the arrangement. Levine compares that coordination problem with agreement on SMTP for email and HTTP for the web: a useful convention has to become shared. He prefers a public office with legal standing as the organizational registry, rather than requiring different companies to agree on a private registry operator. This is his proposed institutional choice, not a claim that the standard has already been adopted.
The final answer makes the token proposal more concrete. One organization need not imply one undifferentiated credential. Different tokens can serve different purposes, expire at different times, and grant access to different things. Their claims include a blockchain address and information another participant can look up and validate before beginning work. That ending supplies the practical direction for the whole proposal: open connection paired with limited, inspectable permission.
Suggest correction
This note stays in this page until you copy or download it. Nothing is submitted; reloading clears the draft.
Resources
Further reading
Levine’s subsequent architecture paper expands the talk’s ideas into explicit mandates, permission checks, privacy across handoffs, and member governance. It distinguishes intelligence that proposes an action from authority that permits execution.
Related talks
- Agentic Security: Permissions, Provenance, and the Agent Supply Chain
A companion topic for examining the permissions and provenance needed beneath Kiduna’s proposed organizational identity.
- CIAM for AI: Authn/Authz for Agents — Michael Grinich, CEO of WorkOS
Continues the distinction between identifying an agent and authorizing what it may do.
- Building safe Payment Infrastructure for the autonomous economy
Pairs the organizational proposal with the practical subject of payment infrastructure for autonomous economic activity.
Read the complete timestamped transcript
- 0:01
[music]
- 0:12
>> Okay, well, this is the very last
- 0:14
session of the entire conference. I hope
- 0:16
you guys have had a great time and we're
- 0:19
going to try and keep the energy high
- 0:21
for the very end. So, we're going to
- 0:23
cover
- 0:24
the lethal trifecta
- 0:26
and most importantly how to get past it.
- 0:29
So, for those of you who don't know, the
- 0:31
lethal trifecta is what is keeping us
- 0:34
from having true agentic commerce, a
- 0:37
full economy on the open internet.
- 0:42
So, the agentic economy starts right
- 0:45
here, right now.
- 0:47
And to really explain this, I want to go
- 0:49
way back in time to November 1993 when I
- 0:52
was at the wedding of a college
- 0:54
roommate.
- 0:55
And a friend of mine there gave me this
- 0:57
little piece of paper and said, "You've
- 0:58
got to join us on the MOO."
- 1:00
And that paper said
- 1:01
lambda.park.xerox.com port 8888.
- 1:07
And this being the '90s, I walked down
- 1:09
the block once I got home to Egghead
- 1:11
Software, bought a 9600 baud modem,
- 1:14
plugged it in, and
- 1:17
my old life ended. Um
- 1:20
uh that's a beautiful blonde girl in my
- 1:23
bed and I was sitting there on the MOO
- 1:26
uh in the
- 1:27
coat closet. And the reason was
- 1:31
you had a real sense of community. It
- 1:35
was like the true virtual world where
- 1:40
it was just text, but it didn't feel
- 1:42
like text. And there was a reason for
- 1:44
that, this concept of composability. So,
- 1:48
someone would come up with a cool It was
- 1:49
all just nouns and verbs. Someone would
- 1:52
come up with a really cool program
- 1:55
and everybody would then change their
- 1:59
player class to that program so they
- 2:01
could morph, they could create a
- 2:04
motorcycle out of a scooter, they could
- 2:06
do all kinds of things because it had
- 2:09
coherence within the entire universe.
- 2:14
And all of this was running on this guy
- 2:16
Pavel Curtis' Spark 10
- 2:20
sitting somewhere in Xerox Park. It
- 2:22
seemed like this infinite world, but it
- 2:23
was just this little box.
- 2:26
And this was big enough that there were
- 2:29
books written about it like my friend
- 2:31
Julian Dibell wrote My Tiny Life.
- 2:33
The magic came from four things all
- 2:36
composing together. The governance, how
- 2:39
it was run, there was an architectural
- 2:41
review board, wizards, etc. The
- 2:43
technology was all right there. The
- 2:47
economics, it was all funded by Xerox
- 2:49
Park, and the culture was most
- 2:52
important. A lot of people don't really
- 2:55
think about or understand culture.
- 2:57
So what happened between 1995
- 3:00
and 2025? Over the course of 30 years,
- 3:03
all of these communities, all the things
- 3:06
that in the early days of the internet
- 3:08
people really loved just got crushed by
- 3:11
platforms. They got crushed by
- 3:13
algorithms.
- 3:15
Because platforms and algorithms are by
- 3:19
their very nature extractive. They look
- 3:22
for whatever value they can remove from
- 3:25
whatever that community is. So if you
- 3:26
have a group on Facebook or LinkedIn or
- 3:29
wherever, what they're doing is saying,
- 3:31
"Okay,
- 3:32
this advertising message is more
- 3:34
important or I can keep this person more
- 3:36
engaged if I put in this dancing person
- 3:40
and it just leads to the infinite scroll
- 3:44
and not real connection. So there is no
- 3:49
real economy of the internet anymore.
- 3:51
It's just a bunch of siloed platforms.
- 3:54
Now, people suddenly thought, "Okay, I
- 3:57
really have something." In January 2026,
- 4:00
Open Cloud, which had been available for
- 4:02
quite a few months, suddenly blew up.
- 4:05
And
- 4:08
something weird happened because the
- 4:10
internet wasn't really designed for all
- 4:12
these agents running around. It was
- 4:14
still designed for these closed
- 4:16
platforms.
- 4:18
So, other agents and miners took
- 4:20
advantage of that.
- 4:22
They did what we call prompt injections.
- 4:26
An agent is incredibly naive. It takes
- 4:30
It doesn't do much except take
- 4:32
information in as a prompt. Now,
- 4:34
normally that information is several
- 4:36
pieces. There's a system prompt, there's
- 4:39
context, there's words, but it's very
- 4:42
easy to hijack by putting
- 4:45
convincing this
- 4:47
naive agent that your its principal and
- 4:51
convincing it to take that private data
- 4:54
and send it someplace else.
- 4:57
So, this is what we call, well, Simon
- 5:00
William Willison came up with this term,
- 5:03
the lethal trifecta. So, you have your
- 5:05
computer
- 5:07
with
- 5:09
your private data, your bank account
- 5:10
information, your logins, um
- 5:13
all kinds of spreadsheets, documents,
- 5:17
memos, your notepad, and
- 5:20
your agents have access to that. And
- 5:23
then there's all this content out there
- 5:25
on the internet,
- 5:27
which is basically untrusted. I mean,
- 5:28
you you you see all these websites it's
- 5:31
searching, but it's very hard for an
- 5:33
agent to know that that's a real job
- 5:36
board versus someone has put something
- 5:38
up to fool it. They really don't know.
- 5:41
And then they can take actions. So, they
- 5:44
fill out a form, an email comes in, that
- 5:47
email they read and all of a sudden it
- 5:50
tells them to expose some secret. So,
- 5:53
there's really no way to solve this.
- 5:56
Except, so what did enterprises do? They
- 5:59
basically said, "Okay, we're keeping
- 6:02
our agents within the enterprise. So,
- 6:05
you have your your agents in Slack and
- 6:07
your agents in Salesforce and your
- 6:08
agents in Notion and your agents in all
- 6:11
these different things. Then you have to
- 6:12
do all this work with APIs and MCP
- 6:15
servers to try and integrate all of
- 6:18
these pieces,
- 6:20
but you lose a ton of context. You don't
- 6:24
there's no
- 6:26
you basically have your sales agents and
- 6:28
you have your finance agents and you
- 6:30
have your research agents, but it just
- 6:33
takes a huge amount of work to figure
- 6:35
out how do we get this all together.
- 6:39
This was a problem literally until
- 6:42
today.
- 6:44
And this is
- 6:45
the miracles of synchronicity, but
- 6:48
there's a new law
- 6:50
in the state of West Virginia, but
- 6:52
applicable globally,
- 6:54
that went into effect yesterday.
- 6:57
And about 2 hours before
- 7:01
uh
- 7:02
I'm here, I got I FedExed the documents
- 7:06
and I got this reply from the Secretary
- 7:08
of State saying, "We have registered
- 7:11
your DUNA
- 7:13
with the Secretary of State's office and
- 7:15
you have this organization number
- 7:17
628407.
- 7:20
So, now we have legal standing for an
- 7:25
organization composed of intelligent
- 7:28
agents. And again, there aren't very
- 7:31
many people here. The end of the thing
- 7:32
I'm going to take a picture because this
- 7:34
is historic and it's um it's going to be
- 7:36
cool that we said 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18
- 7:41
20 21 people
- 7:44
um got to experience this moment. So,
- 7:47
what is a Duna?
- 7:49
It's a true internet native agentic
- 7:53
organization. It stands for
- 7:54
decentralized
- 7:56
unincorporated
- 7:58
nonprofit association.
- 8:01
And these organizations can build the
- 8:04
agentic economy.
- 8:06
They're composable
- 8:08
which means well, we know what that
- 8:11
means. You can build agents on top of
- 8:13
other agents. Permissionless.
- 8:15
It's not like Facebook or your bank
- 8:18
where someone can tell you if you're
- 8:19
banned or not banned. You can have an
- 8:21
account or not banned. Anybody can
- 8:22
connect.
- 8:24
They're accountable. They're registered
- 8:26
somewhere. They're safe and they're
- 8:28
secure. So, the things that they're not,
- 8:30
you don't need a board of directors, you
- 8:31
don't need any executives.
- 8:34
There's no corporate shell.
- 8:36
One thing that's important you can be
- 8:38
very profitable, but you can't
- 8:40
distribute profits to members. If you
- 8:43
did that, then the membership units
- 8:47
would be securities. It would be like
- 8:48
selling membership units in an LLC or
- 8:52
selling membership units in a C corp or
- 8:56
selling stock in a C corp. So, there are
- 8:59
plenty of still ways to distribute there
- 9:01
that value. You can't do it based on
- 9:03
ownership. So, what is it? That's what
- 9:06
it's not. It's member governed.
- 9:08
You have full legal standing. You can
- 9:11
own assets and property. So, your agents
- 9:14
can go out and literally
- 9:16
buy an apartment building and market it.
- 9:19
You know, you can design agents in ways
- 9:21
you were never able to do before. Can
- 9:23
enter into agreements. You can raise
- 9:25
capital.
- 9:27
You can earn profits. You can open bank
- 9:29
accounts, hire people, fire them. And
- 9:32
very importantly, this is all blockchain
- 9:34
verified.
- 9:36
Now, this was designed by Andreessen
- 9:38
Horowitz for the blockchain.
- 9:41
And what was really interesting for
- 9:43
DAOs, for crypto projects, but what I
- 9:47
found was that this is even better for
- 9:50
autonomous agents than it is for
- 9:52
blockchains. A lot of people say
- 9:54
blockchains are a solution looking for a
- 9:57
problem. Well, they've finally found the
- 10:00
problem, which is verifying agentic
- 10:02
identity. Because you can't trick the
- 10:04
blockchain. They you know,
- 10:06
when an agent is associated with a
- 10:09
particular account on the blockchain,
- 10:12
you can resolve that account to a whole
- 10:15
process that went from here to here, the
- 10:18
money went from here to here. If someone
- 10:20
sues an agent in court, you can trace it
- 10:23
back to who is responsible for that
- 10:26
agent. So, it just opens up a whole
- 10:28
world of possibility in terms of the
- 10:32
agentic economy.
- 10:34
So, here it is in a really simple way.
- 10:36
We call agents within the agentic
- 10:40
economy allies. So, you have an ally.
- 10:44
And you also have an agentic
- 10:46
organization, which we call a kiduna.
- 10:49
So, it's based on a
- 10:51
duna, and then we added the kinship
- 10:54
because these are all related. So, it's
- 10:56
a kiduna.
- 10:58
Now, your you create your ally
- 11:03
very simply. You inform it, which means
- 11:06
you put a bunch of material into the
- 11:08
vector database. You infuse it with
- 11:10
wisdom. So, it it knows all about what
- 11:13
you want it to know about. Now, it still
- 11:15
has
- 11:16
you know, whatever LLM you want behind
- 11:18
it, but what's really important about
- 11:20
this is the the information that you
- 11:22
give it if you're a scientist or a
- 11:24
programmer or a psychotherapist or a
- 11:27
lawyer,
- 11:28
you can give it all all information that
- 11:30
you have. Then you instruct it. That's
- 11:32
basically setting up the system prompt,
- 11:34
giving it its character, its stance,
- 11:36
knowing who he is, who it is, she is,
- 11:40
how they
- 11:42
interact with the world. Then you
- 11:44
empower it. You connect up all your
- 11:45
accounts, your enterprise accounts, your
- 11:48
uh Slack, your Telegram, your Twitter.
- 11:52
Um then you set up in enact is giving it
- 11:57
specific abilities and automation. So,
- 11:59
you can do very deep agents, long-term
- 12:02
goals that it works for extended periods
- 12:05
of time. And finally, alignment. Really
- 12:08
giving it a purpose
- 12:10
so that
- 12:11
your ally in different contexts works
- 12:15
for you in the way that you want it to.
- 12:19
Then your organizations get really cool
- 12:22
cuz you're building software, but you're
- 12:24
building your company, your organization
- 12:27
literally as software. It's not
- 12:31
Okay, I have software and then I have
- 12:32
all these people and all the people have
- 12:35
to sign paperwork. This is really
- 12:36
designing the entire organization as
- 12:39
software. So, it can discover new
- 12:41
customers, share value. When you have
- 12:43
profits, when you have revenue, you can
- 12:45
reinvest it. It just all works in a
- 12:48
completely new way.
- 12:50
So, then the agentic economy is just
- 12:52
connecting all these allies and
- 12:54
organizations in all these new
- 12:57
completely flexible ways. And
- 13:01
this
- 13:02
this whole capability did not exist
- 13:04
until yesterday. And today we have the
- 13:07
first actual uh
- 13:10
agentic uh organizations.
- 13:13
So, resolving the lethal trifecta. What
- 13:16
happens? The
- 13:18
The lethal trifecta was private data
- 13:22
going meeting untrusted content and then
- 13:25
taking actions on that content, which
- 13:28
can then reveal your private data and
- 13:30
cause all kinds of chaos.
- 13:32
So, here
- 13:34
these
- 13:35
agents at a deep level establish
- 13:38
identity, authority, and boundaries
- 13:41
within an organization, between
- 13:43
organizations. How do we do that? With
- 13:46
cryptographic tokens. So, we just use
- 13:49
JWT, extremely simple, the whole web
- 13:52
runs on JWT tokens. And they just do
- 13:56
that very quickly so that they know
- 13:59
who where it all goes up. So, ultimately
- 14:02
at the top level, what organization is
- 14:05
registered? And this becomes a lot like
- 14:08
the domain name system. So, all of a
- 14:10
sudden, the Secretary of State of West
- 14:13
Virginia is like, I can
- 14:16
and saying, okay, you can resolve it to
- 14:21
uh Kaiser Permanente or Disney or Pepsi.
- 14:25
You know, not some fentanyl dealer from
- 14:27
North Korea. However, you know, they
- 14:30
can't fool each other because they're
- 14:32
resolving these tokens that are
- 14:33
ultimately registered with an authority.
- 14:37
And you can you can look up by name and
- 14:40
say, okay, organization ID. Well, if I
- 14:42
go to that organization, it's got it'll
- 14:44
have an audit trail on the blockchain
- 14:47
all the way down to this action that was
- 14:49
taken here.
- 14:52
So, governance in the agentic economy is
- 14:54
extremely important.
- 14:57
Because every organization really is
- 15:00
always focused on two different things,
- 15:02
and both of those things are extremely
- 15:04
important. One of that of those things
- 15:08
is sustainability, growth,
- 15:11
its own viability as an organization,
- 15:14
but it the other is what's its mission?
- 15:17
And these organizations might have
- 15:20
hundreds, thousands of people,
- 15:22
eventually millions of people. And so,
- 15:25
we use a technology called decision
- 15:27
markets, which is very much like
- 15:29
prediction markets, like polymarket.
- 15:33
Yet, instead so they trade pass and fail
- 15:35
tokens on policies. Any member can
- 15:38
propose a policy.
- 15:40
What's really interesting is, instead of
- 15:43
saying, um
- 15:45
"Well, I'm persuaded. I'm going to vote
- 15:47
for this." It's not votes. They actually
- 15:50
trade pass and fail tokens. So, LLMs are
- 15:54
always goal-oriented. They want rewards.
- 15:57
They want to win. And you actually get
- 15:59
better decisions if they're not just
- 16:02
convincing each other, but ultimately
- 16:05
they're they're
- 16:07
you get more value. Your tokens are
- 16:09
worth more if you side with the winning
- 16:12
group. So, they sort of see them going
- 16:14
back and forth and what the value of the
- 16:16
tokens are.
- 16:17
So, it's and apparently, all this
- 16:20
science says you reach much better
- 16:21
decisions this way. By infusing the
- 16:24
agents with your purpose, with your
- 16:27
values, with your experiences, with your
- 16:29
aspirations, and then let them argue
- 16:31
instead of, you know, someone convincing
- 16:33
you of something.
- 16:35
So, we're right now
- 16:38
in this wonderful
- 16:40
back small communities who are getting
- 16:43
together for purposes, and we can now
- 16:46
build this agentic economy together.
- 16:48
Nobody can say how to do it. It's really
- 16:51
up to us. Build your agents, build your
- 16:53
organizations.
- 16:56
So, now, just like my friend Matthew
- 17:00
Pahr gave me this little scrap of paper
- 17:03
uh way back in November 1993 at my
- 17:07
roommate Van's wedding, I'm saying,
- 17:09
"Here's your invitation to join us." And
- 17:13
um
- 17:14
you know, let's let's blow this whole
- 17:16
thing up. Let's uh really make it work.
- 17:19
So, it's [REDACTED:email_address].
- 17:22
You can reach me.
- 17:24
LinkedIn, um it's {slash} motodave.
- 17:29
Um I probably haven't updated my
- 17:30
LinkedIn in 5 or 6 years. But, um
- 17:33
if you go to kaduna.club, you can sign
- 17:35
up for early access. And in just a few
- 17:38
weeks, you'll be the very very first
- 17:40
people
- 17:41
who will be building this first um
- 17:45
uh this first Kaduna, as it's called, is
- 17:49
for builders. It's very specifically for
- 17:51
builders. We have templates, all kinds
- 17:53
of different agentic templates um to
- 17:56
say, you know, I'm going to build my
- 17:58
sales agents, I'm going to build my
- 18:00
uh social media agents, I'm going to
- 18:02
build my lawyer agents. And we really
- 18:05
want a whole bunch of different people
- 18:06
in there contributing to this cuz then
- 18:08
you can spin out your own organization
- 18:10
for all kinds of purposes.
- 18:12
Um I purposefully went through this
- 18:14
fairly quickly so that I could take a
- 18:16
couple questions if anyone
- 18:18
if anyone has them.
- 18:21
Yes.
- 18:28
Can you just stand up and yell a little
- 18:29
loud?
- 18:46
Okay, I'm going to One more time.
- 18:50
Mhm.
- 18:53
Yes. So, the idea is the reason we I set
- 18:56
up this first very broad um
- 18:59
uh organization is because anybody can
- 19:02
just register it. You can just say, my
- 19:04
agent is part of an organization, and
- 19:07
it'll trace to it. So, you don't have to
- 19:09
set up your own organization. The first
- 19:11
one is just a big umbrella organization.
- 19:13
So, that kind of So, it's the idea of
- 19:16
now in the open internet, anybody can
- 19:18
just get a code. So, these are just JWT
- 19:22
tokens. I can put it on my website. I
- 19:24
can put it here. I can say if you want
- 19:26
to interact with my agent on Slack or
- 19:28
wherever,
- 19:30
people will just at at a certain point
- 19:32
we're going to have to get the message
- 19:33
out, but it's sort of like email at the
- 19:35
beginning. You know, people had to know
- 19:37
that SMTP, like people were on all kinds
- 19:40
of different mail systems. At some point
- 19:42
they agreed, "Okay, we're going to use
- 19:44
SMTP." Everyone was, you know, using
- 19:47
different FTP servers and some people
- 19:49
were using different ways to do file and
- 19:51
everyone sort of agreed at some point on
- 19:53
HTTP. So, my hope is that I mean,
- 19:58
someone's got to do it and it makes more
- 20:00
sense for
- 20:02
a state, a secretary of state, which has
- 20:06
standing in a public office to be that
- 20:09
registry rather than trying to get all
- 20:12
these different companies together and
- 20:13
say, "Here's how to do it."
- 20:25
Yes, it each um
- 20:29
we're just at the end of this, so let's
- 20:31
talk out out front, but basically the
- 20:33
idea is you can create all kinds of
- 20:35
different tokens for different purposes
- 20:37
and you can set different times to live.
- 20:40
You can say what it has access to. You
- 20:43
can give it access to different things.
- 20:45
The idea is just it's more the standard
- 20:48
and you set a series of claims and it
- 20:50
says it gives a blockchain address. It
- 20:53
gives all the information you need so it
- 20:56
can look up and validate before you say,
- 20:59
"Okay, now we're starting to work
- 21:01
together."
- 21:03
Okay?
- 21:04
So, thanks so much and uh if anyone
- 21:06
appreciate it. I guess I'll let me do
- 21:08
this uh picture.
- 21:10
Um
- 21:12
uh so we can
- 21:14
see all the people.
- 21:17
All right.
- 21:20
You're all going to be famous someday.
- 21:21
Thanks.
- 21:35
>> [music]