October 14, 2026Main stage4 min read

How Compute Markets Work

Evan Conrad traces compute markets back to a startup’s inability to buy the right amount of reliable capacity—and explains why his company ended up operating both the exchange and the hardware.

Evan ConradSan Francisco Compute CompanyCEO

From the conference livestream · 2:49:46–3:07:26 on YouTube. The player starts and stops at this session’s boundaries.

2:49:46 ↗

A lab becomes a broker to survive

San Francisco Compute started with a different ambition: build an AI music company. Evan Conrad describes raising $500,000, taking on a cluster, and discovering that the monthly commitment could sink the business unless the team subleased capacity. Selling that capacity became the work. He recalls carrying hastily made GPU posters around NeurIPS.

That experience gave the company a concrete reason to care about a compute market. A startup needs capacity before it knows precisely how much it will use. A provider needs financial commitments before it can pay for hardware. Neither side can easily unwind the arrangement when circumstances change.

San Francisco Compute now combines a live order book with operation of the underlying infrastructure. Buyers can reserve capacity now or in the future. Conrad calls the arrangement physically settled: the company takes responsibility for delivering usable compute, with control extending through hardware design, networking, bare-metal orchestration, and services above it. The market and the cloud operation developed together. 2:49:46

He frames the challenge as solving two unusually hard problems at once. A market has a cold-start problem. A cloud has an operational problem. Once a company has built the cloud, the prospect of large direct deals gives it a strong incentive to stop there instead of creating a liquid market.

2:53:50 ↗

The risks arrive in one bundle

Conrad walks through the purchase from a new lab's perspective. Available capacity is scarce, so the buyer orders a new cluster with a lead time. Financing depends on the customer's ability to pay. A young company with an ambitious research plan has little conventional credit history, so the provider asks for a large deposit or a long commitment.

The order begins at the moment of greatest uncertainty. The customer has committed cash, but the cluster has not yet arrived and may be delayed. Owning data-center space does not automatically provide the expertise needed to operate a supercomputer. When nodes fail, replacement capacity may also require waiting for physical equipment.

Even after delivery, the buyer can get demand wrong. Too much reserved capacity consumes cash. Too little prevents the product from serving demand. Without a way to resell or purchase an existing commitment, the only route to more capacity may be another newly financed cluster.

These are linked technical, financial, and credit risks. Conrad's argument is that a useful market must relieve the actual constraints behind them, rather than merely publish a GPU price.

He contrasts this with a high-margin software company buying CPU services. In his framing, an AI company's economics can be much more sensitive to the price of its infrastructure. That sensitivity makes customers willing to move for a lower price, which complicates financing a provider on the assumption of stable on-demand demand. Long-term take-or-pay contracts make the lender more comfortable, but can trap the customer in capacity it no longer needs. 2:56:21

3:00:07 ↗

Settlement requires somebody who can fix the cluster

A liquid market could help separate the value of the hardware from the creditworthiness of one customer. Capacity already reserved could move to a buyer that needs it, while the previous buyer could reduce its exposure. Conrad presents that as a possible route, not an inevitable outcome. His competing scenario is consolidation around a few creditworthy buyers.

Operational control remains central to his proposed solution. He compares reselling compute with reselling a hotel reservation. A buyer still needs room service, cleaning, and someone to call when something breaks. A broker who does not run the hotel cannot provide those services. Likewise, a contract for GPUs is only useful if somebody can deliver and repair the service behind it.

That is why San Francisco Compute chose to operate clusters alongside its market. The proposal asks for more than matching a buyer and seller: it requires infrastructure reliable enough to settle the trade. It also explains the temptation to become an ordinary cloud. Building the delivery layer is expensive and difficult, while direct long-term contracts can look attractive once that layer exists.

3:04:08 ↗

Who gets to buy intelligence?

Conrad closes by extending the credit problem from model labs to applications. An inference provider could protect itself by requiring large deposits, long token contracts, or investment-grade customers. In his forecast, that would pass the barrier to every startup that needs inference.

An established company would have the credit to buy intelligence, earn revenue with it, and strengthen its credit further. A small entrant would struggle to make the initial purchase. He explicitly presents growing deposits and industry concentration as the future he is trying to prevent, rather than a measured destiny for the market. 3:04:08

The ending returns to the small lab that could not afford its own cluster. Conrad wants those companies to exist because some may build products and discoveries that larger firms would never attempt. The purpose of the market, in this account, is to make usable capacity transferable enough that a newcomer's lack of credit does not decide whether it gets to compete.

Full transcript 310 timestamped passages

Machine transcription with reviewed terminology and names. Some recognition errors may remain. Timestamps refer to the original livestream.

2:49:48How are we doing?

2:49:51So this is a talk about compute markets, but it's kind of more of a talk about why to make

2:49:57a compute market.

2:49:59If

2:50:00you don't know me, I'm Evan.

2:50:01We run a company called San Francisco Compute.

2:50:04We make a physically settled order, physically settled forwards market.

2:50:08So if you were here for the last talk, the last talk was basically why all the operators of GPU clusters don't really work very well.

2:50:17When we say physically settled, we mean we're the operator.

2:50:21We are both the operator of the hardware in the same way that a cloud is the operator

2:50:25of the hardware, and then we are also the market at the same time.

2:50:29It's kind of like a grid for compute.

2:50:31So the general gist of this is that in order to run and operate a supercomputer, we think

2:50:38problems start right at the design of the supercomputer, right in the design of the

2:50:43bill of materials.

2:50:44It's control of the backplane fabric as well.

2:50:48It's also control of bare metal orchestration.

2:50:50It's also services on top, VMs and so on.

2:50:53There's a lot of different parts of the stack that you have to do effectively.

2:50:57Otherwise, the folks who have a data center and would like to make more money on that

2:51:04data center by becoming the GPU cloud end up failing for the customer.

2:51:10So that's what we do.

2:51:12We offer what's called supercomputing as a service.

2:51:15We go to folks who want to become a cloud.

2:51:16that's like folks who want to become what NVIDIA would call an NCP,

2:51:21or venture firms that want to have clusters for their portfolio

2:51:24and want to be able to reallocate that capacity

2:51:27when a company like Instinct is taking off,

2:51:30or AI companies who would like the residual value on the compute

2:51:33because they've realized that's really important to their financials

2:51:36but don't want to operate a supercomputer.

2:51:38So that's physical settlement.

2:51:40And then on top of that, we run a live order book

2:51:42for capacity that you can buy reserved,

2:51:44served, either right now or in the future.

2:51:49This together is not at all what we thought we were going to be doing.

2:51:54Originally, we were this company called JunLark that was trying to make kind of like Suno or

2:51:59UDO, but prior to Suno or UDO.

2:52:01At the time, what you needed to do to realistically start a lab was you needed to raise a big

2:52:08deposit, a huge one, which was $10 million at the time.

2:52:12We thought that was a crazy amount of money, so we thought, no, that's stupid.

2:52:16We're going to raise 500k and obviously what we're going to do is rent from somebody else.

2:52:21Obviously today it's not $10 million, it's a billion dollars.

2:52:27And nonetheless, we had raised our 500k, we buy a big cluster, and then we're underwater

2:52:33on our cluster every month, and if we didn't sublease our cluster, we would have gone bankrupt.

2:52:38If you have heard of GPU brokers, we were the first GPU broker, so the first year the

2:52:44company was us trying to sell our cluster, otherwise we would go bankrupt.

2:52:47So I would wander around with these actual pieces of paper at NeurIps, which both say

2:52:53H100 and A100 at the same time, because that's how I made the posters so quickly.

2:53:01And so this talk is not really about necessarily how a compute market works, it's how a compute

2:53:08market gets to exist.

2:53:11We like to think about it like there's this pamphlet, and on the pamphlet, on the front

2:53:15side, it's like, man, starting a Neolab sucks, there's all these different financial and

2:53:19economic problems.

2:53:20On the back of the pamphlet, it says compute markets.

2:53:24It's not super clear how one gets to the other until you open the pamphlet and then

2:53:29And holy shit, there's so much stuff in this pamphlet.

2:53:31And it keeps going.

2:53:32There's so many folds.

2:53:33It's a difficult and challenging problem.

2:53:35Because you need to solve two miracle problems to get working.

2:53:39You have to both make a market, which is a uniquely difficult problem because it has

2:53:43a cold start problem.

2:53:44You also have to build a cloud.

2:53:45And you have to not become a cloud.

2:53:47Which is a whole separate challenge.

2:53:50But these are the problems that the labs are facing.

2:53:53And it's about to be the problems that everyone is about to be facing.

2:53:55So if you work at a start-up, these are your problems now.

2:53:58Right now, everybody is sold out of compute.

2:54:01This is probably not going to change for a while.

2:54:05So that means you're going to have to buy a new cluster, a net new one, and there's

2:54:09a lead time.

2:54:10You have no way to pay for that cluster to come online now.

2:54:13You're going to pay for it to come online later.

2:54:14There's nothing in the market that can realistically get that cluster online for you now.

2:54:19Meanwhile, you're going to pay your entire bank balance as a deposit.

2:54:23The reason you're paying your entire bank balance as a deposit

2:54:25is because the lender has no idea how to underwrite AGI.

2:54:29How in the world are you supposed to do that?

2:54:31You've got two-person startups in San Francisco, or maybe New York,

2:54:35who say, I'm going to build superintelligence.

2:54:39No lender knows how to underwrite superintelligence.

2:54:42So they have no idea what the asset is worth.

2:54:45Meanwhile, your cluster is very likely to be delayed.

2:54:48That's because the lender needed to underwrite against the credit risk of the customer,

2:54:51and so they need to know who is the customer first

2:54:54before you deploy the cluster.

2:54:56So right when the customer signs

2:54:57is the riskiest point in the entire operation.

2:55:00You wanted it to be the case

2:55:01that you built the cluster first and then you sell it.

2:55:04This also helps reduce all sorts of different types of problems

2:55:07where clusters break.

2:55:09Meanwhile, most of the people who are setting up clusters

2:55:11are people who have the actual asset

2:55:13that makes the thing cheap.

2:55:14Like you've got the data center space already.

2:55:17What that doesn't get is supercomputing expertise.

2:55:20as we saw in the last talk, if you've watched that one.

2:55:25Meanwhile, you're going to run into the exact same problem

2:55:27that Junelark did,

2:55:28which is you're going to either way overbuy

2:55:30or you're going to way underbuy.

2:55:32That's because AI doesn't have margins

2:55:34that look like SaaS companies.

2:55:35And so you don't have very much margin for error.

2:55:37And so the chances that you either underbuy

2:55:40and somebody else wins because they did it correctly

2:55:42or you overbuy and then you just become stability AI

2:55:45or you blow up, you end up like character AI,

2:55:48are really high.

2:55:50So, these are all the same problem. They're all just different types of risk.

2:55:53They're technical risk, they're financial risk, they're credit risk.

2:55:56They're all one big bundled risk problem, which is the problem that we end up solving,

2:56:00and it's also the problem that we think compute markets broadly, the entire industry solves.

2:56:05So we'll walk through each one of these and walk how that gets to a compute market,

2:56:08because if you don't understand these, it's kind of unclear why you would want a compute market,

2:56:12and they almost seem like this problem that somebody thinks,

2:56:15oh, wow, compute markets are cool, so I'm going to go start one.

2:56:17We think they should be derived from the actual problems that people face,

2:56:21which is, first, everyone is sold out.

2:56:23Why are they sold out?

2:56:24Because the lender couldn't finance the cluster

2:56:26unless you had a long-term off-take agreement.

2:56:28In CPUs, this wasn't the case,

2:56:30because CPU buyers are SaaS companies.

2:56:34SaaS companies have high margins,

2:56:35and because they have high margins,

2:56:37you can build a product that rewards you with high margins for your CPUs.

2:56:48Think about it this way.

2:56:50If you're a SaaS company and your underlying cloud doubles their prices, you don't go bankrupt.

2:56:55You hate your cloud, you're mad, but you don't go bankrupt.

2:56:58If you're an AI company and your underlying cloud doubles their prices, you go bankrupt.

2:57:03And what that means is that you're actually price sensitive, and because you're actually

2:57:07price sensitive, there's nothing keeping you at any particular cloud, so you can't sell

2:57:12on demand because your customers will immediately leave to whoever is cheaper.

2:57:16And so that means that in order to finance GPU clusters, you have to have long-term take-or-pay

2:57:22contracts, hopefully with someone who has investment-grade credit.

2:57:26However, if you don't have liquidity on those, if you're selling reserved and your customer

2:57:30can't get out, then that also means that some other customer who wants the capacity right

2:57:34now because they're like instinct and their product is taking off, can't pay for anything.

2:57:38They have to finance a new cluster which has a lead time because the physical world just

2:57:41exists and it's going to take a while.

2:57:43Sometimes you even have to build the damn data center.

2:57:46And then, because you're financing a new cluster, you're going to pay a deposit.

2:57:49Because almost nobody in AI has any reasonable credit.

2:57:53And because this is a brand new technology, all these companies are new.

2:57:56Meanwhile, even as you start to scale up that ladder, you're still going to run into credit

2:58:01issues all the way through.

2:58:02It's the number one bottleneck of AI at the moment.

2:58:04It's not power.

2:58:05You hit credit way before you hit power.

2:58:11So, what that means is every inference company, every neo lab, they are bottlenecked by how

2:58:16much cash they have in the bank account.

2:58:18So they go back to the venture capitalist who says, oh, I'm going to fund at the model

2:58:22layer, the application layer, the inference layer, because I don't want to fund all of

2:58:25that capex stuff.

2:58:27And so the venture capitalist then funds all the capex stuff by giving the new neo lab

2:58:34or new inference company, the check that they then send to the cloud, which is the deposit

2:58:40for the cluster, and that's how you underwrite the customer.

2:58:45So the clusters then are delayed because the cloud couldn't actually deploy the cluster

2:58:52until they had the customer in hand, and so that was the riskiest point.

2:58:56So therefore, what should have happened was the cloud had bought the cluster ahead of

2:59:02time, and then waited until it was landed in the data center, and then sold it.

2:59:07And that means you have way less likelihood of delays.

2:59:10Meanwhile, the cluster is very likely to break when you get the cluster as the customer because

2:59:15you don't have liquidity.

2:59:16And so if the failure rate is higher than what you expect, and you don't have the ability

2:59:20to transition a node in, then you don't have anywhere you can pull nodes from.

2:59:24Which means that if you need new nodes to make up for the failed ones, you have to RMA

2:59:28them.

2:59:29which means you have to get a new node.

2:59:30And then that gets us back to several steps before

2:59:33where you have the lead time problem again.

2:59:36And so everything breaks for everybody all the time.

2:59:40Once you have gotten through all of that as a new AI lab,

2:59:42your problems are you, you know, you, nobody was sold,

2:59:46like everyone was sold out.

2:59:48You then had to wait a lead time.

2:59:49You paid this big deposit.

2:59:51The thing was delayed and then it broke.

2:59:52And finally you got through all of that.

2:59:54And the likelihood that you predict your demand correctly

2:59:56is very low.

2:59:58And so you're either going to be way

3:00:00over-provisioned or way under-provisioned, and you have no way out.

3:00:02There's no way to sell your capacity to somebody else, and there's no way to buy more capacity if you need it.

3:00:06So, compute markets.

3:00:09To solve these problems, you need to solve a bunch of different problems all at once.

3:00:13You need to underwrite the value of the GPU cluster rather than underwriting the credit risk of the customer.

3:00:20This is how it could work.

3:00:22It's not guaranteed to work like this.

3:00:24In other industries, what happened is everything just consolidated.

3:00:28You got one big credit-worthy customer that does the whole damn industry.

3:00:32That's what the path of AI is currently on track to do.

3:00:36It's instead of going to be a liquid market where anybody can participate,

3:00:40it's going to look like TSMC.

3:00:42You're going to get one buyer or a few buyers that are the clouds.

3:00:46You're going to get a few model labs that are the AI labs.

3:00:49And then you won't get other startups.

3:00:52This is what we think is going to happen.

3:00:54And this is why three years ago, when we were doing our AI lab, we had a chance.

3:00:58We could have said, no, we're not going to stick it out for several years just trying to keep our company alive.

3:01:06We're just going to go do a new AI lab.

3:01:08But we saw this problem.

3:01:10And we said, oh, shit.

3:01:12If we don't do anything about this, then we will just hit this three years from now.

3:01:17And here we are three years from now hitting this problem and where everyone is going to hit this problem.

3:01:22If you watched the last talk, it's very hard to solve this problem unless you are operating

3:01:28both the market and the clusters at the same time.

3:01:33This is Dylan Page.

3:01:34Dylan is the co-chair of the CNCF infrastructure group.

3:01:36That's the organization that makes Kubernetes.

3:01:38He formerly worked at Lambda doing infrastructure there.

3:01:41And he joined San Francisco Compute because GPU Compute isn't sufficiently reliable for

3:01:48the market operator to be divorced from the physical infrastructure.

3:01:50It doesn't work if you aren't the one who is buying the thing.

3:01:53Sorry, it doesn't work if the person you are buying from isn't operating it.

3:01:56To give an example of why this doesn't work is I'm sure some of you are flying in from

3:02:00overseas or out of town and you have a hotel room.

3:02:06Wouldn't it be great if you could sell that hotel room to somebody else?

3:02:10I go to you and I want to buy that hotel room and I say, can I get room service?

3:02:16Can I get my room cleaned?

3:02:18I've got a problem with my room, who do I call?

3:02:21If you don't operate the hotel, you can't fix any of those problems.

3:02:25That's why brokering clusters doesn't work.

3:02:28You have to operate the cluster like the hotel.

3:02:30You have to run the whole damn thing.

3:02:32Otherwise, you can't actually make a market.

3:02:34It doesn't work.

3:02:35You can't do physical settlement.

3:02:37So why does nobody do physical settlement?

3:02:40The problem is there's a very strong incentive to never do physical settlement.

3:02:44That is because if you build out physical settlement for compute, what that literally

3:02:48means is you are building out the entire operating capacity of a GPU cloud.

3:02:52And if you are building out the entire operating capacity of a GPU cloud, you should just be

3:02:57a GPU cloud.

3:02:58Because it looks to be the case that you will make an ungodly amount of money.

3:03:02You will sign billion dollar deal after billion dollar deal.

3:03:06And so, fuck it.

3:03:08Let's not make a GPU cloud, or let's not make a compute market.

3:03:10Let's instead just become a GPU cloud, which is what basically everybody does, because

3:03:15the numbers are astronomical and it's a very reasonable thing to do.

3:03:18The reason why we ended up building physical settlement was because we knew that if we

3:03:22didn't start this, we would then not be able to start an AI lab, which was the real damn

3:03:26thing that we wanted to do in the first place.

3:03:27We wanted to make a lab.

3:03:28We didn't get to make a lab unless this exists.

3:03:32So when we started, it was 10 million as the deposit that you had to pay to start a new

3:03:38lab.

3:03:38This is how you get over the credit risk problem.

3:03:42Then the cluster sizes got bigger, the sort of minimum ante into the space got bigger,

3:03:47then it was 100 million, now it's a billion.

3:03:49We don't think it can continue.

3:03:51We don't think there is a world in which you can get a $10 billion round right out the

3:03:55bat before you have revenue or traction or your product or anything.

3:04:00And what that means is that if you don't solve this problem, we are currently on track to

3:04:05not have any start-ups in AI.

3:04:07Now, one of the things that you could think could happen is maybe there can be new inference

3:04:13companies and new model labs.

3:04:15And the way that they solve the credit problem is that instead they just ship the risk to

3:04:19the application layer.

3:04:20They say, look, I need to get over my credit problem, so what I'm going to do is I'm going

3:04:28to only sign customers who are investment grade credit, you know, Fortune 500, I'm going

3:04:33to only sign customers on five-year contracts for tokens.

3:04:37I'm going to only sign customers for tokens that require a big deposit up front.

3:04:44That is the end of everything.

3:04:48you have inference layer getting bottlenecked by credit, what happens is you can't get tokens

3:04:54unless you have credit or you have a big deposit.

3:04:57the problem of that is that tokens are used by the whole damn economy.

3:05:01There is no rule that says that startups have to exist.

3:05:05If every startup is suddenly bottlenecked by credit in order to access intelligence,

3:05:11what happens is existing firms just ship everything.

3:05:14They themselves get to make the product because they've got credit,

3:05:19and then they make the revenue from that product, and then it makes their credit better.

3:05:22And that's a flywheel that makes consolidation happen throughout the entire economy.

3:05:27If you don't fix this bottleneck, there aren't any startups.

3:05:30This is why we started doing this.

3:05:32Because at one point, what we think is going to happen is you're going to end up in three

3:05:38to five years, you're going to look out and say, I want to start a new startup.

3:05:42To get there, you need to buy so many tokens in order to compete with the existing players.

3:05:50You need to buy $100 million of tokens.

3:05:54We think this is what you're going to have to do in order to start a new company because

3:05:57other people are spending hundreds of millions of dollars of tokens.

3:06:00If you just draw the line out, this is what happens.

3:06:02So you need a big giant deposit because you're two people who have no idea what they're doing

3:06:07and so nobody trusts you.

3:06:09So you're going to go and raise $100 million from your venture capitalist.

3:06:13Meanwhile, nobody wants to work with you because you're a two-person startup.

3:06:17Then you're going to be asked to pay for that hundred, or you're going to be asked to pay

3:06:21for a five-year contract on that hundred million if you're not paying it all as a deposit.

3:06:25And then you just don't get new model labs, you don't get new start-ups.

3:06:28You get a consolidation in the industry.

3:06:31So we, at one point, were this little lab.

3:06:36And what we did is we lived in San Francisco and we knew all the other people who were

3:06:41also just two little folks who had started a start-up and wanted to be able to participate

3:06:46in the most important technology of our time.

3:06:50So I want these people to exist.

3:06:52I want this person to exist and I want this person to exist.

3:06:55I want this startup to exist and this startup to exist and this startup to exist.

3:06:59This one and this one and this one and this one and this one and this one and this one and this one.

3:07:03If you get these companies going, maybe they'll become big folks that build your cancer cures

3:07:09or they build something that nobody thought of or something that wasn't just sort of AI slopped out.

3:07:15This is kind of the problem that compute markets solve.

3:07:18And if you don't solve it, we don't think there's going to be any startups.

3:07:22Cool.

3:07:24That's it.

3:07:25That's it.

3:07:25Yeah.